These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35052357)

  • 1. Who Packed the Drugs? Application of Bayesian Networks to Address Questions of DNA Transfer, Persistence, and Recovery from Plastic Bags and Tape.
    Fonneløp AE; Faria S; Shanthan G; Gill P
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 35052357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of Bayesian Networks and simulation methods to identify the variables impacting the value of evidence assessed under activity level propositions in stabbing cases.
    Samie L; Champod C; Taylor D; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102334. PubMed ID: 32563838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct and Secondary Transfer of Touch DNA on a Credit Card: Evidence Evaluation Given Activity Level Propositions and Application of Bayesian Networks.
    Onofri M; Altomare C; Severini S; Tommolini F; Lancia M; Carlini L; Gambelunghe C; Carnevali E
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Apr; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 37239356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The implications of shedder status and background DNA on direct and secondary transfer in an attack scenario.
    Fonneløp AE; Ramse M; Egeland T; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():48-60. PubMed ID: 28363123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An LR framework incorporating sensitivity analysis to model multiple direct and secondary transfer events on skin surface.
    Gill P; Bleka Ø; Roseth A; Fonneløp AE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102509. PubMed ID: 33930816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of shedder status: A comparison of two methods involving cell counting in fingerprints and the DNA analysis of handheld tubes.
    Johannessen H; Gill P; Roseth A; Fonneløp AE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102541. PubMed ID: 34090062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: A review.
    Taylor D; Kokshoorn B; Biedermann A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():34-49. PubMed ID: 29929059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Bayesian networks to track DNA movement through complex transfer scenarios.
    Taylor D; Samie L; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():69-80. PubMed ID: 31234042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transfer, persistence and recovery of DNA and mRNA vaginal mucosa markers after intimate and social contact with Bayesian network analysis for activity level reporting.
    Johannessen H; Gill P; Shanthan G; Fonneløp AE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Sep; 60():102750. PubMed ID: 35914368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian networks and dissonant items of evidence: A case study.
    De March I; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102172. PubMed ID: 31629186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Casework-related DNA transfer on footwear in consideration of the shedder status.
    Schmidt M; Bamberg M; Dierig L; Kunz SN; Wiegand P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jan; 56():102630. PubMed ID: 34808489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Secondary DNA transfer by working gloves.
    Otten L; Banken S; Schürenkamp M; Schulze-Johann K; Sibbing U; Pfeiffer H; Vennemann M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102126. PubMed ID: 31446345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RFU derived LRs for activity level assignments using Bayesian Networks.
    Gill P; Bleka Ø; Fonneløp AE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jan; 56():102608. PubMed ID: 34735938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the transfer of saliva-derived DNA.
    Warshauer DH; Marshall P; Kelley S; King J; Budowle B
    Int J Legal Med; 2012 Nov; 126(6):851-61. PubMed ID: 22797945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
    Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
    Baechler S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Secondary and subsequent DNA transfer during criminal investigation.
    Fonneløp AE; Egeland T; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():155-162. PubMed ID: 26005954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of considering common sources of unknown DNA when evaluating findings given activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Volgin L; Kokshoorn B; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102518. PubMed ID: 33865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for paternity cases with allelic dependencies.
    Hepler AB; Weir BS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):166-75. PubMed ID: 19079769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Four model variants within a continuous forensic DNA mixture interpretation framework: Effects on evidential inference and reporting.
    Swaminathan H; Qureshi MO; Grgicak CM; Duffy K; Lun DS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207599. PubMed ID: 30458020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.