These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3505417)
1. The empirical jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court. Appelbaum PS Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2-3):335-49. PubMed ID: 3505417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychiatrists and capital sentencing: risks and responsibilities in a unique legal setting. Showalter CR; Bonnie RJ Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 6743848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The insanity defense: an uncertain future. Allen RC MH; 1974; 58(4):4-7. PubMed ID: 4453198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence of gender bias in legal insanity evaluations: a case vignette study of clinicians, judges and students. Yourstone J; Lindholm T; Grann M; Svenson O Nord J Psychiatry; 2008; 62(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 18720232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal outcome and clinical findings: a study of insanity evaluations. Rogers R; Cavanaugh JL; Seman W; Harris M Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 6713107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Posttraumatic stress disorder as an insanity defense: medicolegal quicksand. Sparr LF; Atkinson RM Am J Psychiatry; 1986 May; 143(5):608-13. PubMed ID: 3963248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical issues in forensic psychiatry: from an attorney's perspective. Weiner BA Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 6478068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Morality, equality, and expertise: renegotiating the relationship between psychiatry and the criminal law. Bonnie RJ Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 6713103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The mandatory sentence and Section 2. Dell S J Med Ethics; 1986 Mar; 12(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 3959037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unsuccessful insanity pleas. Tanay E Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jan; 141(1):158-9. PubMed ID: 6691454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Practical ethical problems of the forensic psychiatrist in dealing with attorneys. Sadoff RL Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 6478067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The psychiatrist in court--theatre of the absurd. Lesse S Am J Psychother; 1982 Jul; 36(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 7149080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. When it pays to be insane: three unusual legacies of insanity. Goldstein RL Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1986; 14(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 3768538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The insanity defense in retreat. Bayer R Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Dec; 13(6):13-6. PubMed ID: 6654664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of forensic psychiatry and the insanity defense. Schell-King M; Finneran MR Perspect Psychiatr Care; 1982; 20(2):54-64. PubMed ID: 6923186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Who is culpable? The insanity defense. Carpenter WT Biol Psychiatry; 1983 Sep; 18(9):947-50. PubMed ID: 6640007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A backdoor to policy making: the use of philosophers by the Supreme Court. Rao N Univ Chic Law Rev; 1998; 65(4):1371-401. PubMed ID: 16273694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Recasting Florida's insanity defense. Two modest proposals. Miller EC J Fla Med Assoc; 1993 Oct; 80(10):684-8. PubMed ID: 8270901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]