These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35057294)

  • 1. Biomechanical Analyses of Porous Designs of 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Mandibular Segmental Osteotomy Defects.
    Shen YW; Tsai YS; Hsu JT; Shie MY; Huang HL; Fuh LJ
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Jan; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 35057294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical and Mechanostat analysis of a titanium layered porous implant for mandibular reconstruction: The effect of the topology optimization design.
    Peng WM; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Nizza M; Baur DA; Jiang XF; Dong XT
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 May; 124():112056. PubMed ID: 33947550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A preliminary study of three-dimensional printed porous titanium plate integrated implant for the repair of comminuted acetabular posterior wall fracture with bone defect].
    Zhang YC; Li JJ; Hou WT; Zhang HF; Liu JH
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 May; 32(5):469-474. PubMed ID: 31248245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
    Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3D Printing of Ti-6Al-4V-Based Porous-Channel Dental Implants: Computational, Biomechanical, and Cytocompatibility Analyses.
    Chakraborty A; Das A; Datta P; Majumder S; Barui A; Roychowdhury A
    ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2023 Oct; 6(10):4178-4189. PubMed ID: 37713537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Topological optimization of 3D printed bone analog with PEKK for surgical mandibular reconstruction.
    Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Zhang JX; Jiang XF; Dong XT; Xu X
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Jul; 107():103758. PubMed ID: 32279058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical effect of implant design on four implants supporting mandibular full-arch fixed dentures: In vitro test and finite element analysis.
    Wu AY; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Huang HL
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Oct; 119(10):1514-1523. PubMed ID: 31883628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Osteoconductivity of bioactive Ti-6Al-4V implants with lattice-shaped interconnected large pores fabricated by electron beam melting.
    Goto M; Matsumine A; Yamaguchi S; Takahashi H; Akeda K; Nakamura T; Asanuma K; Matsushita T; Kokubo T; Sudo A
    J Biomater Appl; 2021 Apr; 35(9):1153-1167. PubMed ID: 33106079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical evaluation of additively manufactured patient-specific mandibular cage implants designed with a semi-automated workflow: A cadaveric and retrospective case study.
    van Kootwijk A; Jonker BP; Wolvius EB; Saldivar MC; Leeflang MA; Zhou J; Tümer N; Mirzaali MJ; Zadpoor AA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106097. PubMed ID: 37678107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation and Comparison of Stress in Divergent and Convergent Collar Designs of Implants With Different Bone Densities: A Finite Element Study.
    Panmei G; Kumar A; Basak S; Anal SS; Nongthombam R; Mall BB
    Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e36550. PubMed ID: 37095819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of different biocompatible implant materials on the mechanical stability of dental implants under excessive oblique load.
    Bataineh K; Al Janaideh M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1206-1217. PubMed ID: 31670872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D-printed porous condylar prosthesis for temporomandibular joint replacement: Design and biomechanical analysis.
    Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang JH; Wang R; Xia J; Xu X; Jiang XF; Dong XT
    Technol Health Care; 2022; 30(4):1017-1030. PubMed ID: 35275582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite element analysis of the angle range in trans-inferior alveolar nerve implantation at the mandibular second molar.
    Wu W; Song L; Liu J; Du L; Zhang Y; Chen Y; Tang Z; Shen M
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):928. PubMed ID: 38007495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of implant framework and mandibular flexure on the strain distribution on a Kennedy class II mandible restored with a long-span implant fixed restoration: a pilot study.
    Law C; Bennani V; Lyons K; Swain M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24388719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element and experimental analysis to select patient's bone condition specific porous dental implant, fabricated using additive manufacturing.
    Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Mondal SC; Roychowdhury A
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 Sep; 124():103839. PubMed ID: 32763517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Osseointegration of 3D porous and solid Ti-6Al-4V implants - Narrow gap push-out testing and experimental setup considerations.
    Frosch S; Nüsse V; Frosch KH; Lehmann W; Buchhorn G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104282. PubMed ID: 33348214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of mandibular flexure on the design of implant-supported fixed restorations of different facial types under two loading conditions by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Gao J; Li X; He J; Jiang L; Zhao B
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():928656. PubMed ID: 36105608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical response at peri-implant mandibular bone for variation of pore characteristics of implants: A Finite Element Study.
    Sarkar S; Sahu TP; Datta A; Chandra N; Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Chowdhury AR
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 31741483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study of Biomechanics of Porous Coated Root Form Implant Using Overdenture Attachment: A 3D FEA.
    Savadi RC; Goyal C
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2010 Sep; 10(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 21886409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.