These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35058025)
1. Structural testing of lower-limb prosthetic sockets: A systematic review. Gariboldi F; Pasquarelli D; Cutti AG Med Eng Phys; 2022 Jan; 99():103742. PubMed ID: 35058025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: Part 2 Description and Preliminary evaluation. Fatone S; Caldwell R Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 28132589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interface Pressure System to Compare the Functional Performance of Prosthetic Sockets during the Gait in People with Trans-Tibial Amputation. Ibarra Aguila S; Sánchez GJ; Sauvain EE; Alemon B; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33317006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation-Part 1: Description of technique. Fatone S; Caldwell R Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 28094686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Static strength of lower-limb prosthetic sockets: An exploratory study on the influence of stratigraphy, distal adapter and lamination resin. Gariboldi F; Scapinello M; Petrone N; Migliore GL; Teti G; Cutti AG Med Eng Phys; 2023 Apr; 114():103970. PubMed ID: 37030898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design of lower limb prosthetic sockets: a review. Wang M; Nong Q; Liu Y; Yu H Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Jan; 19(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 34932435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying Bone and Skin Movement in the Residual Limb-Socket Interface of Individuals With Transtibial Limb Loss Using Dynamic Stereo X-Ray: Protocol for a Lower Limb Loss Cadaver and Clinical Study. Maikos JT; Chomack JM; Herlihy DV; Paglia DN; Wetterstrand C; O'Connor JP; Hyre MJ; Loan JP; D'Andrea SE JMIR Res Protoc; 2024 Apr; 13():e57329. PubMed ID: 38669065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D printed transtibial prosthetic sockets: A systematic review. Kim S; Yalla S; Shetty S; Rosenblatt NJ PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275161. PubMed ID: 36215238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations. Mayo AL; Gould S; Cimino SR; Glasford S; Harvey E; Ratto M; Hitzig SL Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Dec; 46(6):607-613. PubMed ID: 36515905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Strength testing of low-cost 3D-printed transtibial prosthetic socket. van der Stelt M; Verhamme L; Slump CH; Brouwers L; Maal TJ Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Mar; 236(3):367-375. PubMed ID: 34852701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adjustable prosthetic sockets: a systematic review of industrial and research design characteristics and their justifications. Baldock M; Pickard N; Prince M; Kirkwood S; Chadwell A; Howard D; Dickinson A; Kenney L; Gill N; Curtin S J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Nov; 20(1):147. PubMed ID: 37926807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic review of effects of current transtibial prosthetic socket designs-Part 1: Qualitative outcomes. Safari MR; Meier MR J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(5):491-508. PubMed ID: 26436666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prosthetic Componentry in Lower Limb Prosthetic Restoration. Speckman RA; Biggs WT Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2024 Nov; 35(4):795-815. PubMed ID: 39389637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Socket considerations for the patient with a transtibial amputation. Fergason J; Smith DG Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Apr; (361):76-84. PubMed ID: 10212599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short partial doffs of release/relock sockets may effectively stabilize limb fluid volume in prosthesis users with transtibial amputation. Lanahan CR; Coburn KA; Hafner BJ; Ballesteros D; Allyn KJ; Friedly JL; Ciol MA; Carter RV; Mertens JC; Krout AJ; Sanders JE Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2023 Jun; 106():105986. PubMed ID: 37210769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of conformal lattice metamaterials for relieving stress in lower limb sockets: A numerical and exploratory study. Barreto MA; Cuan-Urquizo E; Perez-Gonzalez J; Huegel JC Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Nov; 236(11):1635-1645. PubMed ID: 36177996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional printing in prosthetics: Method for managing rapid limb volume change. Nickel E; Barrons K; Hand B; Cataldo A; Hansen A Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Oct; 44(5):355-358. PubMed ID: 32580681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the new, patient-adjustable socket system Varos in the early phase of prosthetic rehabilitation: a pilot study. Nia A; Toetschinger G; Kubinec T; Domayer S Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2022 Jun; 58(3):462-469. PubMed ID: 35148042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the influence of cyclic loading on a laser sintered transtibial prosthetic socket using Digital Image Correlation (DIC). Saey T; Muraru L; Raeve E; Cuppens K; Balcaen R; Creylman V Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5382-5385. PubMed ID: 31947072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Socket size adjustments in people with transtibial amputation: Effects on residual limb fluid volume and limb-socket distance. McLean JB; Redd CB; Larsen BG; Garbini JL; Brzostowski JT; Hafner BJ; Sanders JE Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2019 Mar; 63():161-171. PubMed ID: 30901641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]