195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3505841)
21. Evaluation of a Bayesian regression-analysis computer program using non-steady-state phenytoin concentrations.
Godley PJ; Ludden TM; Clementi WA; Godley SE; Ramsey RR
Clin Pharm; 1987 Aug; 6(8):634-9. PubMed ID: 3691009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of a Bayesian regression-analysis computer program for predicting phenytoin concentration.
Ludden TM; Beal SL; Peck CC; Godley PJ
Clin Pharm; 1986 Jul; 5(7):580-5. PubMed ID: 3755661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Vancomycin dosing: assessment of time to therapeutic concentration and predictive accuracy of pharmacokinetic modeling software.
Nunn MO; Corallo CE; Aubron C; Poole S; Dooley MJ; Cheng AC
Ann Pharmacother; 2011 Jun; 45(6):757-63. PubMed ID: 21652786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Exploration of once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides through Bayesian simulation.
Garrelts JC
Pharmacotherapy; 1996; 16(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 8820474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of the effectiveness of a vancomycin nomogram in achieving target trough concentrations of 15-20 mg/L suggested by the vancomycin consensus guidelines.
Kullar R; Leonard SN; Davis SL; Delgado G; Pogue JM; Wahby KA; Falcione B; Rybak MJ
Pharmacotherapy; 2011 May; 31(5):441-8. PubMed ID: 21923425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Vancomycin monitoring: one or two serum levels?
Andrés I; López R; Pou L; Piñol F; Pascual C
Ther Drug Monit; 1997 Dec; 19(6):614-9. PubMed ID: 9421100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparing 3 methods of monitoring gentamicin concentrations in patients with febrile neutropenia.
Avent ML; Teoh J; Lees J; Eckert KA; Kirkpatrick CM
Ther Drug Monit; 2011 Oct; 33(5):592-601. PubMed ID: 21912332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Correlation coefficient versus prediction error in assessing the accuracy of digoxin dosing methods.
Lalonde RL; Pao D
Clin Pharm; 1984; 3(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 6723224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A simple method to estimate the initial dose of gentamicin.
Lackner TE; Lyss AP
Pharmacotherapy; 1992; 12(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 1608852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical pharmacokinetics of gentamicin. Estimation of initial dosing parameters in hospitalized patients at Al-Amiri Hospital Kuwait.
Al-Lanqawi Y; Capps P; Abudlmalek K; Al-Anezi K; Thusu A; Sharma P
Med Princ Pract; 2009; 18(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 19349724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Vancomycin population pharmacokinetics in neonates.
de Hoog M; Schoemaker RC; Mouton JW; van den Anker JN
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2000 Apr; 67(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 10801244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Nomogram for dosing warfarin at steady state.
Fredriks DA; Coleman RW
Clin Pharm; 1991 Dec; 10(12):923-7. PubMed ID: 1773579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of a two-compartment Bayesian forecasting program for predicting vancomycin concentrations.
Rodvold KA; Pryka RD; Garrison M; Rotschafer JC
Ther Drug Monit; 1989; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 2728085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of 11 methods for predicting theophylline dose.
Rodvold KA; Paloucek FP; Zell M
Clin Pharm; 1986 May; 5(5):403-8. PubMed ID: 3720210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Creatinine-clearance estimates for predicting gentamicin pharmacokinetic values in obese patients.
Leader WG; Tsubaki T; Chandler MH
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Sep; 51(17):2125-30. PubMed ID: 7985687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bayesian regression analysis of non-steady-state phenytoin concentrations: evaluation of predictive performance.
Killilea T; Coleman R; Ludden T; Peck CC; Rose D
Ther Drug Monit; 1989; 11(4):455-62. PubMed ID: 2741195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of using warfarin plasma concentrations in Bayesian forecasting of prothrombin-time response.
Lee C; Coleman RW; Mungall DR
Clin Pharm; 1987 May; 6(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 3665392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Individualization of theophylline dosage: a Bayesian method evaluated in patients with once-daily dosing.
Martz W; Oellerich M; Schnabel D; Sybrecht GW
Ther Drug Monit; 1991 Sep; 13(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 1957334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of binding equation method for prediction of unbound serum valproic acid concentration in pediatric patients with epilepsy.
Kodama Y; Kuranari M; Kodama H; Koike Y; Yasunaga F; Fujii I; Takeyama M
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1995 Feb; 33(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 7757310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical assessment of a two-compartment Bayesian forecasting method for lidocaine.
Beach CL; Farringer JA; Peck CC; Crawford MH; Ludden TM; Clementi WA
Ther Drug Monit; 1988; 10(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 3376185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
