588 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35060034)
21. Site selection by using the multi-criteria technique-a case study of Bafra, Turkey.
Kilicoglu C; Cetin M; Aricak B; Sevik H
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Aug; 192(9):608. PubMed ID: 32865639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China.
Zhou X; Wu W; Lin Z; Zhang G; Chen R; Song Y; Wang Z; Lang T; Qin Y; Ou P; Huangfu W; Zhang Y; Xie L; Huang X; Fu X; Li J; Jiang J; Zhang M; Liu Y; Peng S; Shao C; Bai Y; Zhang X; Liu X; Liu W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 34072874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development of landslide susceptibility maps of Tripura, India using GIS and analytical hierarchy process (AHP).
Nath NK; Gautam VK; Pande CB; Mishra LR; Raju JT; Moharir KN; Rane NL
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jan; 31(5):7481-7497. PubMed ID: 38159190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Statistical Prediction Model for Healthcare and Landslide Sensitivity Evaluation in Coal Mining Subsidence Area.
Ge R; Lv Y; Tao W
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():1805689. PubMed ID: 35607472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Settlement suitability analysis of a riverine floodplain in the perspective of GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis.
Alam N; Saha S; Gupta S; Chatterjee A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(24):66002-66020. PubMed ID: 37093376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multi-hazard spatial modeling via ensembles of machine learning and meta-heuristic techniques.
Bordbar M; Aghamohammadi H; Pourghasemi HR; Azizi Z
Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):1451. PubMed ID: 35087111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Risk factors for mortality in landslide- and flood-affected populations in Uganda.
Agrawal S; Gorokhovich Y; Doocy S
Am J Disaster Med; 2013; 8(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 24352926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Flood sensitivity assessment of super cities.
Wang Z; Chen X; Qi Z; Cui C
Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):5582. PubMed ID: 37019887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Utilization of frequency ratio method for the production of landslide susceptibility maps: Karaburun Peninsula case, Turkey.
Karaman MO; Çabuk SN; Pekkan E
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Dec; 29(60):91285-91305. PubMed ID: 35882738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. GIS-based landslide susceptibility zonation mapping using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method in parts of Kalimpong Region of Darjeeling Himalaya.
Das S; Sarkar S; Kanungo DP
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Mar; 194(3):234. PubMed ID: 35229227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Integration of Vulnerability and Hazard Factors for Landslide Risk Assessment.
Arrogante-Funes P; Bruzón AG; Arrogante-Funes F; Ramos-Bernal RN; Vázquez-Jiménez R
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(22):. PubMed ID: 34831741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Determination of landslide susceptibility with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the role of forest ecosystem services on landslide susceptibility.
Aksoy H
Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Nov; 195(12):1525. PubMed ID: 37994954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using heuristic and bivariate statistical methods for Iva Valley and environs Southeast Nigeria.
Ozioko OH; Igwe O
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Jan; 192(2):119. PubMed ID: 31950278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Application of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide risk assessment as an environmental threat to Izmir city (west Turkey).
Akgun A; Kıncal C; Pradhan B
Environ Monit Assess; 2012 Sep; 184(9):5453-70. PubMed ID: 21915598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A nonstructural flood prevention measure for mitigating urban inundation impacts along with river flooding effects.
Shih SS; Kuo PH; Lai JS
J Environ Manage; 2019 Dec; 251():109553. PubMed ID: 31539701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Flood vulnerability mapping and urban sprawl suitability using FR, LR, and SVM models.
Youssef AM; Pourghasemi HR; Mahdi AM; Matar SS
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(6):16081-16105. PubMed ID: 36178648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Random Forest Model and Frequency Ratio Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing, China).
Wang Y; Sun D; Wen H; Zhang H; Zhang F
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 32545618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. GIS-based data-driven bivariate statistical models for landslide susceptibility prediction in Upper Tista Basin, India.
Das J; Saha P; Mitra R; Alam A; Kamruzzaman M
Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e16186. PubMed ID: 37234665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Determining the effect of urbanization on flood hazard zones in Kahramanmaras, Turkey, using flood hazard index and multi-criteria decision analysis.
Dutal H
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Nov; 195(1):92. PubMed ID: 36352156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Influence of Different Knowledge-Driven Methods on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in the Changbai Mountain Area, Northeast China.
Ma Z; Qin S; Cao C; Lv J; Li G; Qiao S; Hu X
Entropy (Basel); 2019 Apr; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33267086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
