These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35060155)

  • 21. Psychometric properties of visual analog scale assessments for function, pain, and strength compared with disease-specific upper extremity outcome measures in rotator cuff repair.
    Beletsky A; Nwachukwu BU; Gorodischer T; Chahla J; Forsythe B; Cole BJ; Verma NN
    JSES Int; 2020 Sep; 4(3):619-624. PubMed ID: 32939496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does the Addition of PROMIS Pain Instruments Improve the Sensitivity of PROMIS Upper Extremity Scores Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?
    Alben MG; Romeo PV; Papalia AG; Cecora AJ; Kwon YW; Rokito AS; Zuckerman JD; Virk MS
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39098383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of Version 2.0 of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test in Nonshoulder Upper Extremity Patients.
    Tyser AR; Hung M; Bounsanga J; Voss MW; Kazmers NH
    J Hand Surg Am; 2019 Apr; 44(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 30819409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Responsiveness of the PROMIS and its Concurrent Validity with Other Region- and Condition-specific PROMs in Patients Undergoing Carpal Tunnel Release.
    Bernstein DN; Houck JR; Mahmood B; Hammert WC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Nov; 477(11):2544-2551. PubMed ID: 31107341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Establishing and comparing reference preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores in patients undergoing shoulder surgery.
    Guo EW; Elhage K; Cross AG; Hessburg L; Gulledge CM; Mehta N; Verma NN; Makhni EC
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jun; 30(6):1223-1229. PubMed ID: 33010435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Are Inconsistently Correlated With Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Shoulder Pathology: A Systematic Review.
    Matar RN; Shah NS; Grawe BM
    Arthroscopy; 2021 Apr; 37(4):1301-1309.e1. PubMed ID: 33253797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. PROMIS CAT forms demonstrate responsiveness in patients following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair across numerous health domains.
    Fisk F; Franovic S; Tramer JS; Gulledge C; Kuhlmann NA; Chen C; Moutzouros V; Muh S; Makhni EC
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Dec; 28(12):2427-2432. PubMed ID: 31420223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Construct Validity and Precision of Different Patient-reported Outcome Measures During Recovery After Upper Extremity Fractures.
    Jayakumar P; Teunis T; Vranceanu AM; Lamb S; Williams M; Ring D; Gwilym S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Nov; 477(11):2521-2530. PubMed ID: 31490347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test Version 2.0 in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Population.
    Kazmers NH; Qiu Y; Yoo M; Stephens AR; Zeidan M; Zhang Y
    J Hand Surg Am; 2021 Oct; 46(10):927.e1-927.e10. PubMed ID: 33812773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of Patient Demographic Factors on Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression Computer Adaptive Testing Scores in Patients Undergoing Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.
    Meldau JE; Borowsky P; Blanchett J; Stephens J; Muh S; Moutzouros V; Makhni EC
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2019 Nov; 7(11):2325967119884543. PubMed ID: 31803791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Generating the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Using Multivariable Predictive Models and Computer Adaptive Testing to Reduce Survey Burden.
    Tenan MS; Galvin JW; Mauntel TC; Tokish JM; ; Bailey JR; Barlow BT; Bevevino AJ; Bradley MW; Cameron KL; Burns TC; Eckel TT; Garcia EJ; Giuliani JR; Haley CA; Hurvitz AP; Janney CF; Kilcoyne KG; Lanzi JT; LeClere LE; McDonald LS; Min KS; Nesti LJ; Pallis M; Patzkowski JC; Posner MA; Potter BK; Provencher MA; Rhon DI; Roach CJ; Robins RJ; Ryan PM; Schmitz MR; Schuett DJ; Sheean AJ; Slabaugh MA; Smith JL; Volk WR; Waltz RA; Dickens JF
    Am J Sports Med; 2021 Mar; 49(3):764-772. PubMed ID: 33523718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validating the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive tests for upper extremity fracture care.
    Gausden EB; Levack AE; Sin DN; Nwachukwu BU; Fabricant PD; Nellestein AM; Wellman DS; Lorich DG
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1191-1197. PubMed ID: 29567038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state of PROMIS upper extremity after total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Gordon D; Pines Y; Ben-Ari E; As R; Kwon YW; Zuckerman JD; Virk MS
    JSES Int; 2021 Sep; 5(5):894-899. PubMed ID: 34505102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores predict postoperative outcome in total shoulder arthroplasty patients.
    Chen RE; Papuga MO; Nicandri GT; Miller RJ; Voloshin I
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Mar; 28(3):547-554. PubMed ID: 30473243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability of Telephone Acquisition of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test.
    Wilkinson JT; Clawson JW; Allen CM; Presson AP; Tyser AR; Kazmers NH
    J Hand Surg Am; 2021 Mar; 46(3):187-199. PubMed ID: 33243590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) be used as a stand-alone outcome instrument in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty?
    Baumgarten KM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Sep; 31(9):e426-e435. PubMed ID: 35413432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing 3 Common Elbow Procedures.
    Rojas EO; Glass N; Owens J; Anthony CA; Bollier M; Wolf BR; Hettrich C
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2019 Jun; 7(6):2325967119852595. PubMed ID: 31245430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the PROMIS and QuickDASH Instruments in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Population.
    Kazmers NH; Qiu Y; Yoo M; Stephens AR; Tyser AR; Zhang Y
    J Hand Surg Am; 2020 May; 45(5):399-407.e6. PubMed ID: 31955997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The minimal clinically important difference of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and upper extremity computer adaptive tests and QuickDASH in the setting of elbow trauma.
    Randall DJ; Zhang Y; Harris AP; Qiu Y; Li H; Stephens AR; Kazmers NH
    JSES Int; 2021 Nov; 5(6):1132-1138. PubMed ID: 34766096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Risk factors for failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference and significant clinical benefit in PROMIS computer adaptive test domains in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.
    Tramer JS; Yedulla NR; Ziedas AC; Patel M; Franovic S; Muh SJ; Makhni EC
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jul; 31(7):1416-1425. PubMed ID: 35172206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.