These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35060631)

  • 1. An EEG study of the combined effects of top-down and bottom-up attentional selection under varying task difficulty.
    Rashal E; Senoussi M; Santandrea E; Ben-Hamed S; Macaluso E; Chelazzi L; Boehler CN
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Jun; 59(6):e14002. PubMed ID: 35060631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of top-down and bottom-up attention on post-selection posterior contralateral negativity.
    Rashal E; Santandrea E; Ben-Hamed S; Macaluso E; Chelazzi L; Boehler CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):705-717. PubMed ID: 36788197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrated effects of top-down attention and statistical learning during visual search: An EEG study.
    Dolci C; Boehler CN; Santandrea E; Dewulf A; Ben-Hamed S; Macaluso E; Chelazzi L; Rashal E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Aug; 85(6):1819-1833. PubMed ID: 37264294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The roles of feature-specific task set and bottom-up salience in attentional capture: an ERP study.
    Eimer M; Kiss M; Press C; Sauter D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1316-28. PubMed ID: 19803639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional capture by size singletons is determined by top-down search goals.
    Kiss M; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jun; 48(6):784-7. PubMed ID: 21539576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P
    Kerzel D; Burra N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Chen X; Xu B; Chen Y; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14290. PubMed ID: 36946491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Eimer M; Kiss M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 20(8):1423-33. PubMed ID: 18303979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2360-2378. PubMed ID: 31993978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation.
    Noonan MP; Adamian N; Pike A; Printzlau F; Crittenden BM; Stokes MG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 36(6):1797-807. PubMed ID: 26865606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Salience detection and attentional capture.
    Schubö A
    Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 19066945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
    Burra N; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does focused endogenous attention prevent attentional capture in pop-out visual search?
    Seiss E; Kiss M; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Jul; 46(4):703-17. PubMed ID: 19473304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.
    Lasaponara S; Chica AB; Lecce F; Lupianez J; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 21640737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suppression on the basis of template for rejection is reactive: Evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Pang C; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Nan W; Fu S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1148-1162. PubMed ID: 38491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Express attentional re-engagement but delayed entry into consciousness following invalid spatial cues in visual search.
    Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(12):e3967. PubMed ID: 19088847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1215-30. PubMed ID: 26950386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing the top-down contingent capture of attention for abrupt-onset cues: Evidence from cue-elicited N2pc.
    Goller F; Schoeberl T; Ansorge U
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Nov; 57(11):e13655. PubMed ID: 32790903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.