These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35060631)

  • 21. Top-down and bottom-up sources of eye-movement guidance during realistic scene search in Alzheimer's disease.
    Ramzaoui H; Faure S; David R; Spotorno S
    Neuropsychology; 2022 Oct; 36(7):597-613. PubMed ID: 35797174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Physical Salience and Value-Driven Salience Operate through Different Neural Mechanisms to Enhance Attentional Selection.
    Bachman MD; Wang L; Gamble ML; Woldorff MG
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 40(28):5455-5464. PubMed ID: 32471878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attentional capture is modulated by stimulus saliency in visual search as evidenced by event-related potentials and alpha oscillations.
    Forschack N; Gundlach C; Hillyard S; Müller MM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):685-704. PubMed ID: 36525202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Chen X; Xu B; Chen Y; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14290. PubMed ID: 36946491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Weinberger M; Awh E
    J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(14):3180-3191. PubMed ID: 33653697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The initial stage of visual selection is controlled by top-down task set: new ERP evidence.
    Ansorge U; Kiss M; Worschech F; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 21258913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19146288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Towards understanding how we pay attention in naturalistic visual search settings.
    Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM; Matusz PJ
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 244():118556. PubMed ID: 34492292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predicting N2pc from anticipatory HbO activity during sustained visuospatial attention: a concurrent fNIRS-ERP study.
    Huang J; Wang F; Ding Y; Niu H; Tian F; Liu H; Song Y
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():225-34. PubMed ID: 25818691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pre-stimulus activity predicts the winner of top-down vs. bottom-up attentional selection.
    Mazaheri A; DiQuattro NE; Bengson J; Geng JJ
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16243. PubMed ID: 21386896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional capture by a color singleton is stronger at spatially relevant than irrelevant locations: Evidence from an ERP study.
    Su Y; Huang W; Yang N; Yan K; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Oct; 57(10):e13640. PubMed ID: 33460208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Eimer M; Kiss M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 20436192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Top-down task sets for combined features: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for two stages in attentional object selection.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):216-28. PubMed ID: 23143916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.
    Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence for top-down suppression of negative features in the target feature dimension.
    Forstinger M; Ansorge U
    Cognition; 2023 Jun; 235():105415. PubMed ID: 36827730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The distractor positivity (Pd) signals lowering of attentional priority: evidence from event-related potentials and individual differences.
    Burra N; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Jul; 51(7):685-96. PubMed ID: 24707976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Top-down matching singleton cues have no edge over top-down matching nonsingletons in spatial cueing.
    Schoeberl T; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):241-249. PubMed ID: 29959614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.