142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35061066)
1. A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter.
Sun S; Cai J; Li R; Wang Y; Zhao J; Huang Y; Xu L; Yang Q; Wang Z
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 306(3):623-637. PubMed ID: 35061066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patterns of recurrence in FIGO stage IB1-IB2 cervical cancer: Comparison between minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy.
Corrado G; Anchora LP; Bruni S; Sperduti I; Certelli C; Chiofalo B; Giannini A; D'Oria O; Bizzarri N; Legge F; Cosentino F; Turco LC; Vizza E; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Nov; 49(11):107047. PubMed ID: 37862783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Song YL; Li RZ; Feng BJ; Lu YH; Wang LF; Wang ZY; Pei KG; Sun LF; Li R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 50(4):108240. PubMed ID: 38457858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical Hysterectomy With Preoperative Conization in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis.
Zhu X; Ye L; Fu Y; You B; Lu W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 31(3):193-199. PubMed ID: 38016630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of survival outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic radical hysterectomies for early-stage cervical cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Hwang JH; Kim B
J Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Jan; 35(1):e9. PubMed ID: 37857564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association of Hospital Surgical Volume With Survival in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Treated With Radical Hysterectomy.
Bizzarri N; Dostálek L; van Lonkhuijzen LRCW; Giannarelli D; Lopez A; Falconer H; Querleu D; Ayhan A; Kim SH; Ortiz DI; Klat J; Landoni F; Rodriguez J; Manchanda R; Kosťun J; Ramirez PT; Meydanli MM; Odetto D; Laky R; Zapardiel I; Weinberger V; Dos Reis R; Pedone Anchora L; Amaro K; Salehi S; Akilli H; Abu-Rustum NR; Salcedo-Hernández RA; Javůrková V; Mom CH; Scambia G; Cibula D
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 141(1):207-214. PubMed ID: 36701621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Management in the US: A National Cancer Database Analysis.
Wolf J; Wu Y; Hayek J; Zhang Q; Alagkiozidis I
Curr Oncol; 2024 May; 31(5):2836-2845. PubMed ID: 38785496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simple hysterectomy versus radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Taliento C; Scutiero G; Arcieri M; Pellecchia G; Tius V; Bogani G; Petrillo M; Pavone M; Bizzarri N; Driul L; Greco P; Scambia G; Restaino S; Vizzielli G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 50(4):108252. PubMed ID: 38471373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The efficacy of pre-operative conization in patients undergoing surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
Wang Y; Ma B; Li W; Li P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Nov; 49(11):106995. PubMed ID: 37527959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparo-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy as a safe option for minimal invasive surgery in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ronsini C; Köhler C; de Franciscis P; La Verde M; Mosca L; Solazzo MC; Colacurci N
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 36150915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating equity of access and predictors of minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancer from 2000 to 2017 in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cohort study.
McGinnis JM; Pond GR; Reade CJ; Schnarr KL; Simunovic M; Elit LM; Seow HY; Helpman L
J Surg Oncol; 2024 Feb; 129(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 37750346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy.
Li Z; Yang Q; Guo J; Liang G; Duan H; Wang S; Hao M; Liang W; Li D; Zhan X; Xie Q; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():933755. PubMed ID: 35875125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopic, abdominal and gasless laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: trial protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (LAGCC trial).
Tang X; Zhou S; Zhang X; Hua K; He Y; Wang P; Teng Y; Feng W
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1287697. PubMed ID: 38023150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. LACC Trial: Final Analysis on Overall Survival Comparing Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Robledo KP; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Ribeiro R; Lopez A; Yan X; Isla D; Moretti R; Bernardini MQ; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Coleman RL; Obermair A
J Clin Oncol; 2024 May; ():JCO2302335. PubMed ID: 38810208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical hysterectomy case volume and cervical cancer treatment in the era of COVID-19: A multi-site analysis of National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers.
Wickenheisser NE; Dillon M; Broadwater G; Zacherl K; Bixel K; Levine M; Newton M; Thel H; Tucker K; Gehrig P; Khetan VU; Brunette-Masi LL; Matsuo K; Khouri OR; Duhon A; Gowthaman D; Cowan M; Mojdehbakhsh R; Rose S; Olawaiye A; Davidson BA; Moss HA; Havrilesky LJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 179():70-78. PubMed ID: 37944328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Han L; Chen Y; Zheng A; Tan X; Chen H
Am J Cancer Res; 2023; 13(9):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 37818069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The first case of recurrent small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix successfully treated with robotic-assisted super radical hysterectomy.
Mabuchi S; Waki K
Gynecol Oncol Rep; 2021 Nov; 38():100882. PubMed ID: 34926763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: ESGE-SERGS position document and joint-statement.
Working Group of ESGE and SERGS
Facts Views Vis Obgyn; 2020 May; 12(1):13. PubMed ID: 32696020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is it time to call for improvement in surgical techniques for minimally invasive radical hysterectomy?
Chuang L; Koirala P; Nezhat F
JSLS; 2020; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 32161434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive surgery in the management of early stage cervical cancer after the publication of SHAPE trial.
Nistor SI; El Tawab S; Zouridis A; Ferrari F; Soleymani Majd H
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38821544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
