221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35061804)
1. Prospective observational study investigating the effectiveness, safety, women's experiences and quality of life at 3 months regarding cervical ripening methods for induction of labor at term-The MATUCOL study protocol.
Ducarme G; Martin S; Chesnoy V; Planche L; Berte MP; Netier-Herault E
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262292. PubMed ID: 35061804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods for induction of labour: A population-based study using coarsened exact matching.
Blanc-Petitjean P; Carbonne B; Deneux-Tharaux C; Salomé M; Goffinet F; Le Ray C;
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 33(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 31342567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial.
Diguisto C; Le Gouge A; Arthuis C; Winer N; Parant O; Poncelet C; Chauleur C; Hannigsberg J; Ducarme G; Gallot D; Gabriel R; Desbriere R; Beucher G; Faraguet C; Isly H; Rozenberg P; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F;
PLoS Med; 2021 Feb; 18(2):e1003448. PubMed ID: 33571294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Ghosh A; Lattey KR; Kelly AJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 12(12):CD006901. PubMed ID: 27918616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Term prelabor rupture of membranes: Foley catheter versus dinoprostone as ripening agent.
Athiel Y; Crequit S; Bongiorno M; Sanyan S; Renevier B
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 49(8):101834. PubMed ID: 32585393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive factors for successful cervical ripening using a double-balloon catheter after previous cesarean delivery.
Vital M; Grange J; Le Thuaut A; Dimet J; Ducarme G
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Sep; 142(3):288-294. PubMed ID: 29893994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical Osmotic Dilators versus Dinoprostone for Cervical Ripening during Labor Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 14 Controlled Trials.
Al-Matary A; Alsharif SA; Bukhari IA; Baradwan S; Alshahrani MS; Khadawardi K; Badghish E; Albouq B; Baradwan A; Abuzaid M; Al-Jundy H; Alyousef A; Ragab WS; Abu-Zaid A
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e2034-e2046. PubMed ID: 37336231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol vs transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS).
Alkmark M; Carlsson Y; Wendel SB; Elden H; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Saltvedt S; Sengpiel V; Wessberg A; Wikström AK; Hagberg H; Wennerholm UB
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Aug; 100(8):1463-1477. PubMed ID: 33768520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical ripening after cesarean section: a prospective dual center study comparing a mechanical osmotic dilator vs. prostaglandin E2.
Koenigbauer JT; Schalinski E; Jarchau U; Gauger U; Brandt K; Klaucke S; Scharf JP; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
J Perinat Med; 2021 Sep; 49(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 34333894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical cervicAl ripeninG for women with PrOlongedPregnancies (MAGPOP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a silicone double balloon catheter versus the Propess system for the slow release of dinoprostone for cervical ripening of prolonged pregnancies.
Diguisto C; Le Gouge A; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F
BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016069. PubMed ID: 28912192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cervical ripening and labor induction: Evaluation of single balloon catheter compared to double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert].
Pez V; Deruelle P; Kyheng M; Boyon C; Clouqueur E; Garabedian C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018; 46(7-8):570-574. PubMed ID: 29903553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Khoury AN; Zhou QP; Gorenberg DM; Nies BM; Manley GE; Mecklenburg FE
J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11444788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods of induction of labor and women's experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analyses.
Blanc-Petitjean P; Dupont C; Carbonne B; Salomé M; Goffinet F; Ray CL;
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Sep; 21(1):621. PubMed ID: 34521377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.
Ezebialu IU; Eke AC; Eleje GU; Nwachukwu CE
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD010762. PubMed ID: 26068943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Tenore JL
Am Fam Physician; 2003 May; 67(10):2123-8. PubMed ID: 12776961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin.
Maier JT; Metz M; Watermann N; Li L; Schalinski E; Gauger U; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 28672756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
