199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35061917)
1. Retrospective study of endodontic treatment performed by undergraduate students using reciprocating instrumentation and single-cone obturation.
Gavini G; Candeiro GTM; Potgornik Ferreira F; Rubino GA; Aun CA; Bezerra AG; Malavasi M; Lemos ÉM; Caldeira CL; Akisue E
J Dent Educ; 2022 Jun; 86(6):751-758. PubMed ID: 35061917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students using nickel-titanium reciprocating versus hand instruments.
Miçooğulları Kurt S; Kandemir Demirci G; Serefoglu B; Kaval ME; Güneri P; Çalışkan MK
J Dent Educ; 2022 Dec; 86(12):1662-1670. PubMed ID: 35830253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students at the University of Khartoum, Sudan.
Elsayed RO; Abu-Bakr NH; Ibrahim YE
Aust Endod J; 2011 Aug; 37(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 21771183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percentage of Gutta-percha Filled Areas in Canals Obturated with Cross-linked Gutta-percha Core-carrier Systems, Single-Cone and Lateral Compaction Technique.
Schäfer E; Schrenker C; Zupanc J; Bürklein S
J Endod; 2016 Feb; 42(2):294-8. PubMed ID: 26679718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of dentinal crack propagation, amount of gutta percha remaining and time required during removal of gutta percha using two different rotary instruments and hand instruments - An
Tejaswi S; Singh A; Manglekar S; Ambikathanaya UK; Shetty S
Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Apr; 25(4):524-530. PubMed ID: 35439914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of Root Filling after Obturation with Gutta-percha and 3 Different Sealers of Minimally Instrumented Root canals of the Maxillary First Molar.
Zhong X; Shen Y; Ma J; Chen WX; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1030-1035. PubMed ID: 31182216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of reciprocating instruments for removing filling material in curved canals obturated with a single-cone technique: a micro-computed tomographic analysis.
Fruchi Lde C; Ordinola-Zapata R; Cavenago BC; Hungaro Duarte MA; Bueno CE; De Martin AS
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1000-4. PubMed ID: 24935552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of the fracture resistances of endodontically treated teeth filled using five different root canal filling systems.
Sandikci T; Kaptan RF
Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 25385899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A preliminary analysis of the morphology of lateral canals after root canal filling using a tooth-clearing technique.
Venturi M; Prati C; Capelli G; Falconi M; Breschi L
Int Endod J; 2003 Jan; 36(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 12656515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers.
Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Dinçol ME; Dağlaroğlu R
Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):756-62. PubMed ID: 22432937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed by dental students at the Dental Teaching Center in Jordan.
Barrieshi-Nusair KM; Al-Omari MA; Al-Hiyasat AS
J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 15053913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo performance of the new non-instrumentation technology (NIT) for root canal obturation.
Lussi A; Suter B; Fritzsche A; Gygax M; Portmann P
Int Endod J; 2002 Apr; 35(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 12059936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Graduating dental students' ability to produce quality root canal fillings using single- or multiple-cone obturation techniques.
Gound TG; Sather JP; Kong TS; Makkawy HA; Marx DB
J Dent Educ; 2009 Jun; 73(6):696-705. PubMed ID: 19491347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of cross-sectional root canal shape on filled canal volume and remaining root filling material after retreatment.
Rechenberg DK; Paqué F
Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 23190273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals.
Gordon MP; Love RM; Chandler NP
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15667630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the incidence of postoperative pain after root canal filling with warm vertical obturation with resin-based sealer and sealer-based obturation with calcium silicate-based sealer: a prospective clinical trial.
Yu YH; Kushnir L; Kohli M; Karabucak B
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):5033-5042. PubMed ID: 33555456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical quality of a matching-taper single-cone filling technique following rotary instrumentation compared with lateral compaction after manual preparation: a retrospective study.
Krug R; Krastl G; Jahreis M
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):643-652. PubMed ID: 27522217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Instrument Design and Access Outlines on the Removal of Root Canal Obturation Materials in Oval-shaped Canals.
Niemi TK; Marchesan MA; Lloyd A; Seltzer RJ
J Endod; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1550-4. PubMed ID: 27552837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative evaluation of gutta-percha filled areas in curved root canals obturated with different techniques.
Schäfer E; Nelius B; Bürklein S
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):225-30. PubMed ID: 21249509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Push-out bond strength of root fillings made with C-Point and BC sealer versus gutta-percha and AH Plus after the instrumentation of oval canals with the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne.
Pawar AM; Pawar S; Kfir A; Pawar M; Kokate S
Int Endod J; 2016 Apr; 49(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 25827240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]