These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35063814)

  • 1. Next Generation Identification system: Latent print matching algorithm and casework practices.
    Tom KR; Knorr KB; Davis CE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Mar; 332():111180. PubMed ID: 35063814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of AFIS "sufficiency" in friction ridge examination.
    Neumann C; Armstrong DE; Wu T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():114-125. PubMed ID: 27111746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects and benefits of a latent print AFIS deferral policy.
    Hudman R; Hines D; Hilliard S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 360():112047. PubMed ID: 38733654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel approach for latent print identification using accurate overlays to prioritize reference prints.
    Gantz DT; Gantz DT; Walch MA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Dec; 245():162-70. PubMed ID: 25447189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utilizing AFIS searching tools to reduce errors in fingerprint casework.
    Langenburg G; Hall C; Rosemarie Q
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():123-133. PubMed ID: 26295930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated Latent Fingerprint Recognition.
    Cao K; Jain AK
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2019 Apr; 41(4):788-800. PubMed ID: 29993769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. End-to-End Automated Latent Fingerprint Identification With Improved DCNN-FFT Enhancement.
    Deshpande UU; Malemath VS; Patil SM; Chaugule SV
    Front Robot AI; 2020; 7():594412. PubMed ID: 33501354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pores and ridges: high-resolution fingerprint matching using level 3 features.
    Jain AK; Chen Y; Demirkus M
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2007 Jan; 29(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 17108380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Latent print comparison and examiner conclusions: A field analysis of case processing in one crime laboratory.
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Neuman M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Feb; 319():110642. PubMed ID: 33338673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical note: Next generation identification - A powerful tool in cold case investigations.
    Stokes J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jun; 299():74-79. PubMed ID: 30959402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of human-technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts.
    Dror IE; Wertheim K; Fraser-Mackenzie P; Walajtys J
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 22212067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated 'lights-out' searching of all recovered fingerprints: Review of the current workflow for latent fingerprint processing in Queensland, Australia.
    O'Malley T; Krosch MN; Peacock P; Cook R; Neville DH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Aug; 337():111372. PubMed ID: 35780517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How often do fingerprint examiners disagree in routine casework?
    O'Connor R; Chapman A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 361():112139. PubMed ID: 38971142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jul; 324():110823. PubMed ID: 34004529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated latent fingerprint identification system: A review.
    Singla N; Kaur M; Sofat S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Apr; 309():110187. PubMed ID: 32163854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Latent fingerprint matching.
    Jain AK; Feng J
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2011 Jan; 33(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 21088321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance evaluation of automated fingerprint identification systems for specific conditions observed in casework using simulated fingermarks.
    de Jongh A; Rodriguez CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 22458701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():65-75. PubMed ID: 28324769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of AFIS for linking scenes of crime.
    Hefetz I; Liptz Y; Vaturi S; Attias D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():e25-7. PubMed ID: 26996923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.