These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35064526)

  • 1. Reluctance against the machine: Retrieval of observational stimulus-response episodes in online settings emerges when interacting with a human, but not with a computer partner.
    Giesen CG; Rothermund K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):855-865. PubMed ID: 35064526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intimacy Effects on Action Regulation: Retrieval of Observationally Acquired Stimulus-Response Bindings in Romantically Involved Interaction Partners Versus Strangers.
    Giesen C; Löhl V; Rothermund K; Koranyi N
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1369. PubMed ID: 30123169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Not so social after all: Video-based acquisition of observational stimulus-response bindings.
    Giesen CG; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jun; 217():103330. PubMed ID: 33991796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cling together, swing together? Assessing indirect retrieval of stimulus-response bindings for associated stimuli.
    Arunkumar M; Rothermund K; Kunde W; Mocke V; Giesen CG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38874797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrieval effects of observationally acquired stimulus-response bindings in participants with high and low autistic traits.
    Giesen CG; Husken L; Schneider D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Mar; 48(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 35130016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smaller Than Expected.
    Giesen CG; Nagel L; Rudolph M; Rothermund K
    Exp Psychol; 2021 May; 68(3):137-148. PubMed ID: 34374306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexible goal imitation: Vicarious feedback influences stimulus-response binding by observation.
    Giesen C; Scherdin K; Rothermund K
    Learn Behav; 2017 Jun; 45(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 27800568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Law of Recency: An Episodic Stimulus-Response Retrieval Account of Habit Acquisition.
    Giesen CG; Schmidt JR; Rothermund K
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2927. PubMed ID: 32010017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconciling cognitive-control and episodic-retrieval accounts of sequential conflict modulation: Binding of control-states into event-files.
    Dignath D; Johannsen L; Hommel B; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1265-1270. PubMed ID: 31380673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of a partner's task on memory for content and source.
    Elekes F; Sebanz N
    Cognition; 2020 May; 198():104221. PubMed ID: 32058100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. To be or not to be...included in an event file: integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping.
    Frings C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1209-27. PubMed ID: 21707218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Copying competitors? Interdependency modulates stimulus-based retrieval of observed responses.
    Giesen C; Herrmann J; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1978-91. PubMed ID: 25151104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parietal Representations of Stimulus Features Are Amplified during Memory Retrieval and Flexibly Aligned with Top-Down Goals.
    Favila SE; Samide R; Sweigart SC; Kuhl BA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 38(36):7809-7821. PubMed ID: 30054390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compatibility-sequence effects in the Simon task reflect episodic retrieval but not conflict adaptation: evidence from LRP and N2.
    Spapé MM; Band GP; Hommel B
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Sep; 88(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 21767598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How the mind shapes action: Offline contexts modulate involuntary episodic retrieval.
    Frings C; Koch I; Moeller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2449-2459. PubMed ID: 28836229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings.
    Whitehead PS; Pfeuffer CU; Egner T
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):26. PubMed ID: 36072115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Being in the Know: The Role of Awareness and Retrieval of Transient Stimulus-Response Bindings in Selective Contingency Learning.
    Arunkumar M; Rothermund K; Kunde W; Giesen CG
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):36. PubMed ID: 36072091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):645-659. PubMed ID: 24294915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for a Selective Influence of Short-Term Experiences on the Retrieval of Item-Specific Long-Term Bindings.
    Dames H; Kiesel A; Pfeuffer CU
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):32. PubMed ID: 36072120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Encoding and retrieving faces and places: distinguishing process- and stimulus-specific differences in brain activity.
    Prince SE; Dennis NA; Cabeza R
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Sep; 47(11):2282-9. PubMed ID: 19524092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.