These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35064536)

  • 1. A systematic review of magnetic versus conventional ureteric stents for short term ureteric stenting.
    Lyons L; Kinnear N; Hennessey D
    Ir J Med Sci; 2022 Dec; 191(6):2763-2769. PubMed ID: 35064536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ureteric stenting with magnetic retrieval: an alternative to traditional methods.
    O'Kelly JA; Haroon UM; Rauf AJ; Breen KJ; McGuire BB; Cheema IA; McLornan L; Forde JC
    Ir J Med Sci; 2020 Feb; 189(1):289-293. PubMed ID: 31418152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Function Improved of the Newly Designed Magnetic-End Ureteric Stenting Retrieval Device: A Clinical Prospective Randomized and Control Trial in a Multicenter Study.
    Zeng S; Liu B; Hu H; Shi J; Qian P; Zhang X; Peng K; Yang S; Huang Z; Pan T
    Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2022; 2022():4107491. PubMed ID: 35517991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of pain perception associated with use of the magnetic-end ureteric double-J stent for short-term ureteric stenting.
    Sevcenco S; Eredics K; Lusuardi L; Klingler HC
    World J Urol; 2018 Mar; 36(3):475-479. PubMed ID: 29236163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early versus late ureteric stent removal after kidney transplantation.
    Thompson ER; Hosgood SA; Nicholson ML; Wilson CH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD011455. PubMed ID: 29376218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ureteric stents on extraction strings: a systematic review of literature.
    Oliver R; Wells H; Traxer O; Knoll T; Aboumarzouk O; Biyani CS; Somani BK;
    Urolithiasis; 2018 Apr; 46(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27324264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic Ureteral Stent Removal Without Cystoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Rassweiler MC; Michel MS; Ritter M; Honeck P
    J Endourol; 2017 Aug; 31(8):762-766. PubMed ID: 28478732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and effectiveness of magnetic ureteric stent removal under ultrasound control: a randomized single center trial.
    Li J; Gauhar V; Lim EJ; Dmitriy S; Vladimir O; Dmitriy G; Igor S; Gadzhiev N
    World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):2889-2896. PubMed ID: 37243718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The utility of stent on strings in clinical practice.
    Lynch OE; Redmond EJ; Inder MS; Flynn RJ; Thomas AZ; Smyth LG; Manecksha RP
    Ir J Med Sci; 2020 Feb; 189(1):283-287. PubMed ID: 31402433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic Stent Removal in a Nurse Led Clinic; a Nine Month Experience.
    O'Connell L; Broe MP; Rooney D; Elhag S; Cheema I; McGuire BB
    Ir Med J; 2018 Feb; 111(2):687. PubMed ID: 29952436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical significance of ureteral stent removal by flexible cystoscopy on pain and satisfaction in young males: a prospective randomised control trial.
    Jeong YB; Doo AR; Park HS; Shin YS
    Urolithiasis; 2016 Aug; 44(4):367-70. PubMed ID: 26520434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The sentinel stent? A systematic review of the role of prophylactic ureteric stenting prior to colorectal resections.
    Croghan SM; Zaborowski A; Mohan HM; Mulvin D; McGuire BB; Murphy M; Galvin DJ; Lennon G; Quinlan D; Winter DC
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1161-1178. PubMed ID: 31175421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-length or 24 cm ureteric stent? A multicentre randomised comparison of stent-related symptoms using a validated questionnaire.
    Calvert RC; Wong KY; Chitale SV; Irving SO; Nagarajan M; Biyani CS; Browning AJ; Young JG; Timoney AG; Keeley FX; Burgess NA
    BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1099-104. PubMed ID: 22882647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparation of intraureteral stent and conventional stent at different stages: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Zheng C; Wang J; Jian T; Lu J; Wang C; He L
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2023 Dec; 75(6):696-710. PubMed ID: 37350583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluoroscopically guided transurethral removal and/or replacement of ureteric stents in women.
    McCarthy E; Kavanagh J; McKernan S; O'Mahony N; McEniff N; Ryan JM; Guiney M
    Acta Radiol; 2015 May; 56(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 24792357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduction of stent-associated morbidity by minimizing stent material: a prospective, randomized, single-blind superiority trial assessing a customized 'suture stent'.
    Betschart P; Piller A; Zumstein V; Schmid HP; Engeler DS; Güsewell S; Pratsinis M; Abt D
    BJU Int; 2021 May; 127(5):596-605. PubMed ID: 33152169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Removal Efficiency and Safety of Magnetic Versus Conventional Ureteral Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Cheng C; Ma Y; Jin S; Wen J; Jin X
    Eur Urol Open Sci; 2023 Jun; 52():22-29. PubMed ID: 37182117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prophylactic Ureteric Stents in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Versus Late Removal.
    Patel P; Rebollo-Mesa I; Ryan E; Sinha MD; Marks SD; Banga N; Macdougall IC; Webb MC; Koffman G; Olsburgh J
    Am J Transplant; 2017 Aug; 17(8):2129-2138. PubMed ID: 28188678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forgotten ureteric stents in renal transplant recipients: three case reports.
    Bardapure M; Sharma A; Hammad A
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2014 Jan; 25(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 24434392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis showing the beneficial effect of α-blockers on ureteric stent discomfort.
    Lamb AD; Vowler SL; Johnston R; Dunn N; Wiseman OJ
    BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1894-902. PubMed ID: 21453351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.