190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35065151)
1. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography vs Endoscopy Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Detection of Anatomic Variants of the Pancreatic Duct in Children.
Lin TK; Vitale DS; Abu-El-Haija M; Anton CG; Crotty E; Li Y; Zhang B; Trout AT
J Pediatr; 2022 May; 244():120-124. PubMed ID: 35065151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Miss rate of pancreas divisum by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice.
Carnes ML; Romagnuolo J; Cotton PB
Pancreas; 2008 Aug; 37(2):151-3. PubMed ID: 18665075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the surgical diagnosis of pancreatic diseases.
Yamaguchi K; Chijiwa K; Shimizu S; Yokohata K; Morisaki T; Tanaka M
Am J Surg; 1998 Mar; 175(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 9560120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Pancreas divisum and pancreatitis].
Khristenko E; Tjaden C; Klauß M
Radiologe; 2021 Jun; 61(6):541-547. PubMed ID: 33942124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.
Dillman JR; Patel RM; Lin TK; Towbin AJ; Trout AT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2377-2383. PubMed ID: 30874847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Administration of secretin (RG1068) increases the sensitivity of detection of duct abnormalities by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis.
Sherman S; Freeman ML; Tarnasky PR; Wilcox CM; Kulkarni A; Aisen AM; Jacoby D; Kozarek RA
Gastroenterology; 2014 Sep; 147(3):646-654.e2. PubMed ID: 24906040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pancreas divisum and santorinicele: assessment by dynamic magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography during secretin stimulation.
Manfredi R; Brizi MG; Costamagna G; Masselli G; Vecchioli Scaldazza A; Marano P
Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 11859301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Secretin Improves Visualization of Nondilated Pancreatic Ducts in Children Undergoing MRCP.
Li Y; Dillman JR; Anton CG; Crotty EJ; Smith EA; Abu-El-Haija M; Trout AT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):917-922. PubMed ID: 32023119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pancreas divisum and "santorinicele": diagnosis with dynamic MR cholangiopancreatography with secretin stimulation.
Manfredi R; Costamagna G; Brizi MG; Spina S; Maresca G; Vecchioli A; Mutignani M; Marano P
Radiology; 2000 Nov; 217(2):403-8. PubMed ID: 11058635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms.
Feldman DR; Kulling DP; Kay CL; Cole DJ; Cunningham JT; Hawes RH; Tarnasky PR; Cotton PB; Baron PL
Ann Surg Oncol; 1997 Dec; 4(8):634-8. PubMed ID: 9416410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraductal papillary tumors of the pancreas: evaluation with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Sugiyama M; Atomi Y; Hachiya J
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Feb; 93(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 9468232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance study of the pancreatic duct.
Calvo MM; Calderón A; Heras I; Durán M; Orive V; Cabriada J; Astigarraga E
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1999 Apr; 91(4):287-96. PubMed ID: 10348928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pancreatic duct evaluation: accuracy of portal venous phase 64 MDCT.
Anderson SW; Soto JA
Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 18425544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ERCP for evaluation of the pancreatic duct.
Calvo MM; Bujanda L; Calderón A; Heras I; Cabriada JL; Bernal A; Orive V; Astigarraga E
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Feb; 97(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 11866272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.
Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Pancreas divisum: Diagnostic importance of MR cholangiopancreatography].
Yağmurlu B; Erden A; Erden I
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Sep; 9(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 14661601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRCP of congenital pancreaticobiliary malformation.
Kamisawa T; Tu Y; Egawa N; Tsuruta K; Okamoto A; Kamata N
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 16680507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
