These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35065536)

  • 21. Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: visual angularity is hard, high-pitched, and bright.
    Walker P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1792-809. PubMed ID: 22833281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cross-cultural differences in crossmodal correspondences between basic tastes and visual features.
    Wan X; Woods AT; van den Bosch JJ; McKenzie KJ; Velasco C; Spence C
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1365. PubMed ID: 25538643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hearing mouth shapes: Sound symbolism and the reverse McGurk effect.
    Spence C; Deroy O
    Iperception; 2012; 3(8):550-2. PubMed ID: 23145309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modeling Noise-Related Timbre Semantic Categories of Orchestral Instrument Sounds With Audio Features, Pitch Register, and Instrument Family.
    Reymore L; Beauvais-Lacasse E; Smith BK; McAdams S
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():796422. PubMed ID: 35432090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Timbral perception is influenced by unconscious presentation of hands playing musical instruments.
    Doi H; Yamaguchi K; Sugisaki S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jun; 75(6):1186-1191. PubMed ID: 34507501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Smelling shapes: crossmodal correspondences between odors and shapes.
    Hanson-Vaux G; Crisinel AS; Spence C
    Chem Senses; 2013 Feb; 38(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 23118203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. I know that "Kiki" is angular: The metacognition underlying sound-shape correspondences.
    Chen YC; Huang PC; Woods A; Spence C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):261-268. PubMed ID: 30097975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What makes a shape "baba"? The shape features prioritized in sound-shape correspondence change with development.
    Chow HM; Ciaramitaro V
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Mar; 179():73-89. PubMed ID: 30476696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Global shape perception contributes to crossmodal correspondences.
    Chen YC; Huang PC; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Mar; 47(3):357-371. PubMed ID: 33492162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fast lemons and sour boulders: Testing crossmodal correspondences using an internet-based testing methodology.
    Woods AT; Spence C; Butcher N; Deroy O
    Iperception; 2013; 4(6):365-79. PubMed ID: 24349696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Steady state visual evoked potentials reveal a signature of the pitch-size crossmodal association in visual cortex.
    Sciortino P; Kayser C
    Neuroimage; 2023 Jun; 273():120093. PubMed ID: 37028733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Coarse to Fine Audio-Visual Size Correspondences Develop During Primary School Age.
    Cuturi LF; Tonelli A; Cappagli G; Gori M
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2068. PubMed ID: 31572264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neural Basis of the Sound-Symbolic Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pseudowords and Visual Shapes.
    McCormick K; Lacey S; Stilla R; Nygaard LC; Sathian K
    Multisens Res; 2021 Aug; 35(1):29-78. PubMed ID: 34384048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sounds Modulate the Perceived Duration of Visual Stimuli via Crossmodal Integration.
    Asaoka R; Gyoba J
    Multisens Res; 2016; 29(4-5):319-35. PubMed ID: 29384606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing the Role of Emotional Mediation in Explaining Crossmodal Correspondences Involving Musical Stimuli.
    Spence C
    Multisens Res; 2020 Jul; 33(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 31648195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How automatic are crossmodal correspondences?
    Spence C; Deroy O
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Mar; 22(1):245-60. PubMed ID: 23370382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cognitive Styles Differentiate Crossmodal Correspondences Between Pitch Glide and Visual Apparent Motion.
    Guo L; Bao M; Guan L; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2017 Jan; 30(3-5):363-385. PubMed ID: 31287072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of visual experience in the emergence of cross-modal correspondences.
    Hamilton-Fletcher G; Pisanski K; Reby D; Stefańczyk M; Ward J; Sorokowska A
    Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():114-121. PubMed ID: 29502009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned?
    Spence C; Deroy O
    Iperception; 2012; 3(5):316-8. PubMed ID: 23145286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. When "Bouba" equals "Kiki": Cultural commonalities and cultural differences in sound-shape correspondences.
    Chen YC; Huang PC; Woods A; Spence C
    Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():26681. PubMed ID: 27230754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.