163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35065881)
1. Prostate-specific antigen nomogram to predict advanced prostate cancer using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve boosting.
Hashimoto T; Komori O; Nakashima J; Kashima T; Yamaguchi Y; Satake N; Nakagami Y; Shishido T; Namiki K; Ohno Y
Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 40(4):162.e9-162.e16. PubMed ID: 35065881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and Internal Validation of a Novel Model to Identify the Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer.
Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Zaffuto E; Bandini M; Dell'Oglio P; Bravi CA; Fallara G; Pellegrino F; Nocera L; Karakiewicz PI; Tian Z; Freschi M; Montironi R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2017 Oct; 72(4):632-640. PubMed ID: 28412062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and comparison of a Chinese nomogram adding multi-parametric MRI information for predicting extracapsular extension of prostate cancer.
Chen Y; Yu W; Fan Y; Zhou L; Yang Y; Wang H; Jiang Y; Wang X; Wu S; Jin J
Oncotarget; 2017 Mar; 8(13):22095-22103. PubMed ID: 27564265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting extracapsular extension in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Satake N; Ohori M; Yu C; Kattan MW; Ohno Y; Miyakawa A; Hatano T; Tachibana M
Int J Urol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 20132361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Gacci M; Schiavina R; Lanciotti M; Masieri L; Serni S; Vagnoni V; Abdollah F; Carini M; Martorana G; Montorsi F
Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 23296120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative nomograms for predicting extracapsular extension in Korean men with localized prostate cancer: a multi-institutional clinicopathologic study.
Chung JS; Choi HY; Song HR; Byun SS; Seo Si; Song C; Cho JS; Lee SE; Ahn H; Lee ES; Kim WJ; Chung MK; Jung TY; Yu HS; Choi YD
J Korean Med Sci; 2010 Oct; 25(10):1443-8. PubMed ID: 20890424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nomogram Predicting Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer in Patients with Clinically Organ-Confined Disease Who Underwent Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group).
Kawase M; Goto T; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Sasaki T; Ishihara T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Kobayashi T; Makiyama K; Inoue T; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koga F; Urakami S; Koie T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Oct; 30(11):6925-6933. PubMed ID: 37338747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate specific antigen density of the transition zone for predicting pathological stage of localized prostate cancer in patients with serum prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng./ml.
Zlotta AR; Djavan B; Petein M; Susani M; Marberger M; Schulman CC
J Urol; 1998 Dec; 160(6 Pt 1):2089-95. PubMed ID: 9817330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A nomogram for predicting low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer: a tool in selecting patients for active surveillance.
Nakanishi H; Wang X; Ochiai A; Trpkov K; Yilmaz A; Donnelly JB; Davis JW; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ
Cancer; 2007 Dec; 110(11):2441-7. PubMed ID: 17932909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined multiple clinical characteristics for prediction of discordance in grade and stage in prostate cancer patients undergoing systematic biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Liu H; Tang K; Xia D; Peng E; Wang L; Chen Z
Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Nov; 216(11):153235. PubMed ID: 33035728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Cozzi G; Peveri G; Bagnardi V; Catellani M; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Pricolo P; Conti A; Alessi S; Marvaso G; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 32150328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a new nomogram to predict insignificant prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Kim TH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
Scand J Urol; 2017 Feb; 51(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28168924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External validation of the Briganti nomogram to estimate the probability of specimen-confined disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Roumiguié M; Beauval JB; Filleron T; Benoit T; Rischmann P; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Soulié M; Malavaud B; Ploussard G
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E113-E119. PubMed ID: 24684584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new nomogram to predict pathologic outcome following radical prostatectomy.
Crippa A; Srougi M; Dall'Oglio MF; Antunes AA; Leite KR; Nesrallah LJ; Ortiz V
Int Braz J Urol; 2006; 32(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 16650292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive value of four kallikrein markers for pathologically insignificant compared with aggressive prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens: results from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer section Rotterdam.
Carlsson S; Maschino A; Schröder F; Bangma C; Steyerberg EW; van der Kwast T; van Leenders G; Vickers A; Lilja H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2013 Nov; 64(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 23683475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
