154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35066507)
21. Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications.
Seager MJ; Patel U; Anderson CJ; Gonsalves M
Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20170666. PubMed ID: 29436848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Utilization of Renal Mass Biopsy for T1 Renal Lesions across Michigan: Results from MUSIC-KIDNEY, A Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.
Patel AK; Lane BR; Chintalapati P; Fouad L; Butaney M; Budzyn J; Johnson A; Qi J; Schervish E; Rogers CG
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2021 Aug; 30():37-43. PubMed ID: 34337546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Value of percutaneous kidney biopsy in the management of solid renal tumours less or equal to 4 cm].
Rybikowski S; Tomatis L; Arroua F; Ragni E; Rossi D; Bastide C
Prog Urol; 2008 Jun; 18(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 18558321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An In-vivo Prospective Study of the Diagnostic Yield and Accuracy of Optical Biopsy Compared with Conventional Renal Mass Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Interim Analysis.
Buijs M; Wagstaff PGK; de Bruin DM; Zondervan PJ; Savci-Heijink CD; van Delden OM; van Leeuwen TG; van Moorselaar RJA; de la Rosette JJMCH; Laguna Pes MP
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Dec; 4(6):978-985. PubMed ID: 29079496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Renal tumour size measured radiologically before surgery is an unreliable variable for predicting histopathological features: benign tumours are not necessarily small.
Remzi M; Katzenbeisser D; Waldert M; Klingler HC; Susani M; Memarsadeghi M; Heinz-Peer G; Haitel A; Herwig R; Marberger M
BJU Int; 2007 May; 99(5):1002-6. PubMed ID: 17437434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Utility of Renal Mass Biopsy in Shared Decision-Making for Renal Mass Treatment.
Chung R; Kurtzman JT; Gillespie A; Martina LP; Wang C; McKiernan JM; Anderson CB
Urology; 2023 Aug; 178():98-104. PubMed ID: 37149060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Renal mass core biopsy: accuracy and impact on clinical management.
Maturen KE; Nghiem HV; Caoili EM; Higgins EG; Wolf JS; Wood DP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):563-70. PubMed ID: 17242269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle core biopsy of renal masses: A single center experience in China.
Wang X; Lv Y; Xu Z; Aniu M; Qiu Y; Wei B; Li X; Wei Q; Dong Q; Lin T
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Mar; 97(13):e0178. PubMed ID: 29595650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. CT fluoroscopy-guided renal tumour cutting needle biopsy: retrospective evaluation of diagnostic yield, safety, and risk factors for diagnostic failure.
Iguchi T; Hiraki T; Matsui Y; Fujiwara H; Sakurai J; Masaoka Y; Gobara H; Kanazawa S
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):283-290. PubMed ID: 28770407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Lessons learned from the comparative study between renal mass biopsy and the analysis of the surgical specimen.
Domínguez-Esteban M; Villacampa-Aubá F; Garcia-Muñóz H; Tejido Sánchez A; Romero Otero J; de la Rosa Kehrmann F
Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Dec; 38(10):655-61. PubMed ID: 24704129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy and implications of percutaneous renal biopsy in the management of renal masses.
Londoño DC; Wuerstle MC; Thomas AA; Salazar LE; Hsu JW; Danial T; Chien GW
Perm J; 2013; 17(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 24355883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic Needle Biopsies in Renal Masses: Patient and Physician Perspectives.
Golan S; Lotan P; Tapiero S; Baniel J; Nadu A; Yossepowitch O
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):749-753. PubMed ID: 28753807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Incidental renal tumours: the frequency of benign lesions and the role of preoperative core biopsy.
Vasudevan A; Davies RJ; Shannon BA; Cohen RJ
BJU Int; 2006 May; 97(5):946-9. PubMed ID: 16643475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Real-life use of diagnostic biopsies before treatment of kidney cancer: results from a Norwegian population-based study.
Beisland C; Johannesen TB; Reisæter LAR; Hjelle KM
Scand J Urol; 2018 Feb; 52(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 29249179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Value of percutaneous biopsy for solid renal tumours less than 4 cm in diameter based on a series of 53 cases].
Thuillier C; Long JA; Lapouge O; Pasquier D; Terrier N; Bocqueraz F; Cyprien J; Descotes JL; Rambeaud JJ
Prog Urol; 2008 Jul; 18(7):435-9. PubMed ID: 18602603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Imaging guided biopsy of renal masses: indications, accuracy and impact on clinical management.
Wood BJ; Khan MA; McGovern F; Harisinghani M; Hahn PF; Mueller PR
J Urol; 1999 May; 161(5):1470-4. PubMed ID: 10210375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Short-term complications for percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy of renal masses in adult outpatients.
Rasmussen LR; Loft M; Nielsen TK; Bjødstrup Jensen M; Høyer S; Hørlyck A; Graumann O
Acta Radiol; 2018 Apr; 59(4):491-496. PubMed ID: 28718664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Renal biopsies performed before versus during ablation of T1 renal tumors: implications for prevention of overtreatment and follow-up.
Widdershoven CV; Aarts BM; Zondervan PJ; Henderickx MMEL; Klompenhouwer EG; van Delden OM; Prevoo W; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; van Moorselaar RJA; Bex A; Lagerveld BW
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jan; 46(1):373-379. PubMed ID: 32564209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Percutaneous core biopsy of small renal mass lesions: a diagnostic tool to better stratify patients for surgical intervention.
Menogue SR; O'Brien BA; Brown AL; Cohen RJ
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4 Pt B):E146-51. PubMed ID: 22805186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Contemporary trends in percutaneous renal mass biopsy utilization in the United States.
Ozambela M; Wang Y; Leow JJ; Silverman SG; Chung BI; Chang SL
Urol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 38(11):835-843. PubMed ID: 32912815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
