141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35066720)
1. Mastectomy or Margin Re-excision? A Nomogram for Close/Positive Margins After Lumpectomy for DCIS.
Martins Maia C; Siderides C; Jaffer S; Weltz C; Cate S; Ahn S; Boolbol S; Ru M; Moshier E; Port E; Schmidt H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):3740-3748. PubMed ID: 35066720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery.
Jung JJ; Kang E; Kim EK; Kim SM; Jang M; La Yun B; Park SY; Shin HC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32647937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of consensus guidelines for breast-conserving surgery in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Tremelling A; Aft RL; Cyr AE; Gillanders WE; Glover-Collins K; Herrmann V; Margenthaler JA
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 May; 5(5):e1502. PubMed ID: 34245135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic factors for residual occult disease in shave margins during partial mastectomy.
Siegel JB; Mukherjee R; Park Y; Cluver AR; Chung C; Cole DJ; Lockett MA; Klauber-DeMore N; Abbott AM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Sep; 189(2):471-481. PubMed ID: 34132936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.
Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positive margins prediction in breast cancer conservative surgery: Assessment of a preoperative web-based nomogram.
Alves-Ribeiro L; Osório F; Amendoeira I; Fougo JL
Breast; 2016 Aug; 28():167-73. PubMed ID: 27326978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Residual disease after re-excision lumpectomy for close margins.
Sabel MS; Rogers K; Griffith K; Jagsi R; Kleer CG; Diehl KA; Breslin TM; Cimmino VM; Chang AE; Newman LA
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Feb; 99(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 19065638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Lumpectomy and Cavity Shave Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Abdelsattar JM; Afridi FG; Dai Z; Yousaf N; Seldomridge A; Battin AO; Wen S; Gray D; Marsh JW; Cowher MS; Partin JF; Hazard-Jenkins H; Lupinacci K
Am Surg; 2023 Mar; 89(3):424-433. PubMed ID: 34196595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying Factors and Techniques to Decrease the Positive Margin Rate in Partial Mastectomies: Have We Missed the Mark?
Edwards SB; Leitman IM; Wengrofsky AJ; Giddins MJ; Harris E; Mills CB; Fukuhara S; Cassaro S
Breast J; 2016 May; 22(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 26854189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Margin index is not a reliable tool for predicting residual disease after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS.
Fisher CS; Klimberg VS; Khan S; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3155-9. PubMed ID: 21947593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-menopausal Status, High Nuclear Grade, Tumor Size >30 mm and Positive Resection Margins Are Predictors of Residual Tumor After Lumpectomy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.
Joste M; Mendes V; Tixier S; Palpacuer C; Laviolle B; Leveque J; Ouldamer L
Anticancer Res; 2015 Jun; 35(6):3471-7. PubMed ID: 26026112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the relationship between ductal carcinoma in situ, calcifications, and margin status in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery.
Bruenderman EH; Bhutiani N; Mercer MK; McMasters KM; Sanders MAG; Ajkay NL
J Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 119(6):694-699. PubMed ID: 30742316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mastectomy margins for ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS): 18 Years of follow-up.
ElSherif A; Freyvogel Ramirez M; Moore EC; Dietz JR; Tu C; Valente SA
Am J Surg; 2023 Nov; 226(5):646-651. PubMed ID: 37481406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors Associated With Positive Margins in Women Undergoing Breast Conservation Surgery.
Murphy BL; Boughey JC; Keeney MG; Glasgow AE; Racz JM; Keeney GL; Habermann EB
Mayo Clin Proc; 2018 Apr; 93(4):429-435. PubMed ID: 29439832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of margin status in breast conservation surgery and its correlation with subsequent re-excision findings.
Krishnamurthy K; Febres-Aldana CA; Alghamdi S; Mesko T; Paramo J; Poppiti RJ
Pathologica; 2019 Mar; 111(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 31217620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of systematic cavity shave margins in breast-conserving surgery at a large community hospital with a low baseline re-excision rate.
Vetter C; Ashok A; Perez M; Musaad S; Rahimi G; Gohil K; Higham A
Breast J; 2020 Oct; 26(10):1960-1965. PubMed ID: 33078470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.
Guidroz JA; Larrieux G; Liao J; Sugg SL; Scott-Conner CE; Weigel RJ
Surgery; 2011 Oct; 150(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22000194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ: does histologic grade or estrogen receptor status matter?
Fauveau LR; Dao TN; Wallace LB; Mamawala MK; Obaid A; Waddimba AC; Grant MD
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Jun; 199(2):215-220. PubMed ID: 37027122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of field cancerization on the extent of duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in breast tissue after conservative excision.
Asioli S; Morandi L; Cavatorta C; Cucchi MC; Foschini MP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1806-1813. PubMed ID: 27546014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
