177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35066835)
41. Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Network in Zhengzhou Metropolitan Area, China.
Huo J; Shi Z; Zhu W; Li T; Xue H; Chen X; Yan Y; Ma R
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(13):. PubMed ID: 35805723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Evolution and interaction relationship of "eco-economy" dual grid pattern in Lingwu City, Ningxia, China.
Ma CH; Liu YY; Yang H; Li CH; Yang ZH
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2023 Nov; 34(11):3095-3104. PubMed ID: 37997421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Scale effect of Nanjing urban green infrastructure network pattern and connectivity analysis.].
Yu YP; Yin HW; Kong FH; Wang JJ; Xu WB
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2016 Jul; 27(7):2119-2127. PubMed ID: 29737118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Integrating ecosystem services and complex network theory to construct and optimize ecological security patterns: a case study of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China.
Zhang Y; Cao Y; Huang Y; Wu J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(31):76891-76910. PubMed ID: 37247145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. How can the landscape ecological security pattern be quantitatively optimized and effectively evaluated? An integrated analysis with the granularity inverse method and landscape indicators.
Guan D; Jiang Y; Cheng L
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(27):41590-41616. PubMed ID: 35094273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Designing Ecological Security Patterns Based on the Framework of Ecological Quality and Ecological Sensitivity: A Case Study of Jianghan Plain, China.
Su X; Zhou Y; Li Q
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Planning of Green Space Ecological Network in Urban Areas: An Example of Nanchang, China.
Li H; Chen W; He W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Oct; 12(10):12889-904. PubMed ID: 26501298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Coupling urban 3-D information and circuit theory to advance the development of urban ecological networks.
Kong F; Wang D; Yin H; Dronova I; Fei F; Chen J; Pu Y; Li M
Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1140-1150. PubMed ID: 33477199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Changes in the land-use landscape pattern and ecological network of Xuzhou planning area.
Zhou X; Chu Z; Ji X
Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8854. PubMed ID: 38632291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessment of ecological resilience in Nanchang based on "risk-connectivity-potential".
Xiao S; Duo LH; Zou ZL
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2023 Mar; 34(3):733-741. PubMed ID: 37087657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Integrating Landscape Ecological Risks and Ecosystem Service Values into the Ecological Security Pattern Identification of Wuhan Urban Agglomeration.
Xiong H; Hu H; Han P; Wang M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36833487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Research on recognition and protection of ecological security patterns based on circuit theory: a case study of Jinan City.
Huang J; Hu Y; Zheng F
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Apr; 27(11):12414-12427. PubMed ID: 31993899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Construction of Ecological Network of Yangtze Huaihe River Diversion Project (Anhui) Based on Landscape Connectivity Index.
Jin J; Ding W; Zhu Z; Zhou J; Shi G; Ma Y; Chen Z
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():9945687. PubMed ID: 35875779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Identifying the ecological security patterns of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China.
Dai Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(30):45837-45847. PubMed ID: 35150427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Research on Multi-Scale Ecological Network Connectivity-Taking the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area as a Case Study.
Wu J; Zhang S; Wen H; Fan X
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36429982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Construction of green infrastructure network based on spatial priority in downtown of Fuzhou, China.].
He K; Lin T; Wu JF; Sui MF; Liu L; Ding GC
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2021 Apr; 32(4):1424-1432. PubMed ID: 33899411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Dynamic changes of landscape connectivity for ecological lands and distance thresholds in the middle reaches of the Heihe River, Northwest China.].
Meng JJ; Wang XD; You NS; Zhu LK
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2016 Jun; 27(6):1715-1726. PubMed ID: 29737677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Environmental mitigation hierarchy and biodiversity offsets revisited through habitat connectivity modelling.
Bergès L; Avon C; Bezombes L; Clauzel C; Duflot R; Foltête JC; Gaucherand S; Girardet X; Spiegelberger T
J Environ Manage; 2020 Feb; 256():109950. PubMed ID: 31818748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Identification of priority areas for ecological restoration based on ecological security and landscape elements.
Zhang J; Chen H; Ma Y; Liu D; Liang X; Chen W
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(12):35307-35325. PubMed ID: 36527548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Identifying and optimizing ecological spatial patterns based on the bird distribution in the Yellow River Basin, China.
Xu C; Yu Q; Wang F; Qiu S; Ai M; Zhao J
J Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 348():119293. PubMed ID: 37827082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
