BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35067032)

  • 1. [Resection margin of colorectal cancer surgery].
    Gu J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jan; 25(1):36-39. PubMed ID: 35067032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive Factors of Positive Circumferential and Longitudinal Margins in Early T3 Colorectal Cancer Resection.
    Balbaa MA; Elkady N; Abdelrahman EM
    Int J Surg Oncol; 2020; 2020():6789709. PubMed ID: 32685211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer.
    Patel A; Green N; Sarmah P; Langman G; Chandrakumaran K; Youssef H
    Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Feb; 23(2):151-159. PubMed ID: 30783863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Circumferential Resection Margin Status as a Predictive Factor for Recurrence in Preoperative MRI for Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer Without Preoperative Therapy.
    Mazaki J; Tsukamoto S; Miyake M; Moritani K; Sakamoto R; Shida D; Kanemitsu Y
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Jan; 64(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 33306533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Continuous Effect of Radial Resection Margin on Recurrence and Survival in Rectal Cancer Patients Who Receive Preoperative Chemoradiation and Curative Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.
    Sung S; Kim SH; Lee JH; Nam TK; Jeong S; Jang HS; Song JH; Lee JW; Bae JM; Lee JH
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jul; 98(3):647-653. PubMed ID: 28581407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Formalin Fixation on Resection Margins in Colorectal Cancer.
    Lam D; Kaneko Y; Scarlett A; D'Souza B; Norris R; Woods R
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2019 Oct; 27(7):700-705. PubMed ID: 31195869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Circumferential margin plays an independent impact on the outcome of rectal cancer patients receiving curative total mesorectal excision.
    Lin HH; Lin JK; Lin CC; Lan YT; Wang HS; Yang SH; Jiang JK; Chen WS; Lin TC; Liang WY; Chang SC
    Am J Surg; 2013 Nov; 206(5):771-7. PubMed ID: 23871321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cancer of the upper rectum.
    Bondeven P
    Dan Med J; 2016 Oct; 63(10):. PubMed ID: 27697137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision.
    Tilney HS; Tekkis PP; Sains PS; Constantinides VA; Heriot AG;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jan; 50(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17115338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patterns of failure in rectal cancer with positive circumferential resection margin after surgery following preoperative chemoradiation: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Kim Y; Kim DY; Kim TH; Kim SY; Baek JY; Kim MJ; Chang HJ; Cha Y; Park SC; Oh JH
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 91(1092):20180143. PubMed ID: 30129789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High Rate of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Colon Cancer: A National Appraisal and Call for Action.
    Healy MA; Peacock O; Hu CY; Bednarski BK; Tillman MM; Messick C; Kaur H; Chang GJ
    Ann Surg; 2022 Dec; 276(6):1023-1028. PubMed ID: 33630474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Importance of surgical margins in rectal cancer.
    Mukkai Krishnamurty D; Wise PE
    J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 113(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 27094456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin.
    Wang L; Gu GL; Li ZW; Peng YF; Gu J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 20(27):9138-45. PubMed ID: 25083087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The minimum distal resection margin in rectal cancer surgery and its impact on local recurrence - A retrospective cohort analysis.
    Manegold P; Taukert J; Neeff H; Fichtner-Feigl S; Thomusch O
    Int J Surg; 2019 Sep; 69():77-83. PubMed ID: 31362126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Circumferential margin involvement after total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer: are all R1 resections equal?
    Beaufrère A; Guedj N; Maggiori L; Patroni A; Bedossa P; Panis Y
    Colorectal Dis; 2017 Nov; 19(11):O377-O385. PubMed ID: 28941054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High Rate of Positive Circumferential Resection Margins Following Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Call to Action.
    Rickles AS; Dietz DW; Chang GJ; Wexner SD; Berho ME; Remzi FH; Greene FL; Fleshman JW; Abbas MA; Peters W; Noyes K; Monson JR; Fleming FJ;
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):891-8. PubMed ID: 26473651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The prognostic impact of resection margin status varies according to the genetic and morphological evaluation (GAME) score for colorectal liver metastasis.
    Wang HW; Wang LJ; Jin KM; Bao Q; Li J; Wang K; Xing BC
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):619-626. PubMed ID: 34081792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of total mesorectal excision and of circumferential resection margin in local recurrence and survival of patients with rectal carcinoma.
    Tzardi M
    Dig Dis; 2007; 25(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 17384508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the results of anorectal (abdominoperineal) resection be improved: are circumferential resection margins too often positive?
    Radcliffe A
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Mar; 8(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 16466553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic importance of circumferential resection margin in the era of evolving surgical and multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Detering R; Rutgers MLW; Bemelman WA; Hompes R; Tanis PJ
    Surgery; 2021 Aug; 170(2):412-431. PubMed ID: 33838883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.