326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35067220)
1. Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Xie WT; Wang YQ; Xiang ZS; Du ZS; Huang SX; Chen YJ; Tang LN
J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35067220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of IOTA SR and O-RADS combined with CA125, HE4, and risk of malignancy algorithm to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Yang Y; Ju H; Huang Y
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110926. PubMed ID: 37418798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of adnexal lesions using photoacoustic imaging to improve sonographic O-RADS risk assessment.
Zhu Q; Luo H; Middleton WD; Itani M; Hagemann IS; Hagemann AR; Hoegger MJ; Thaker PH; Kuroki LM; MCourt CK; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Siegel CL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 62(6):891-903. PubMed ID: 37606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the diagnostic value of using serum CA125 and GI-RADS system in the evaluation of adnexal masses.
Zheng H; Tie Y; Wang X; Yang Y; Wei X; Zhao X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(7):e14577. PubMed ID: 30762809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External Validation of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) Lexicon and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis 2-Step Strategy to Stratify Ovarian Tumors Into O-RADS Risk Groups.
Timmerman S; Valentin L; Ceusters J; Testa AC; Landolfo C; Sladkevicius P; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Fruscio R; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kudla MJ; Chiappa V; Alcazar JL; Leone FPG; Buonomo F; Coccia ME; Guerriero S; Deo N; Jokubkiene L; Kaijser J; Scambia G; Andreotti R; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Van Calster B; Froyman W
JAMA Oncol; 2023 Feb; 9(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 36520422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Basha MAA; Metwally MI; Gamil SA; Khater HM; Aly SA; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Khattab EM; Azmy TM; Alayouty NA; Mohey N; Almassry HN; Yousef HY; Ibrahim SA; Mohamed EA; Mohamed AEM; Afifi AHM; Harb OA; Algazzar HY
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):674-684. PubMed ID: 32809166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Ultrasound Scores in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.
Pelayo M; Pelayo-Delgado I; Sancho-Sauco J; Sanchez-Zurdo J; Abarca-Martinez L; Corraliza-Galán V; Martin-Gromaz C; Pablos-Antona MJ; Zurita-Calvo J; Alcázar JL
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37046525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of performance between O-RADS, IOTA simple rules risk assessment and ADNEX model in the discrimination of ovarian Brenner tumors.
Shang J; Lei T; Wu L; Lin M; Xie H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Sep; 308(3):961-970. PubMed ID: 37186266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective comparative trial comparing O-RADS, IOTA ADNEX model, and RMI score for preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses for prediction of ovarian cancer.
Poonyakanok V; Tanmahasamut P; Jaishuen A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 May; 49(5):1412-1417. PubMed ID: 36895122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the diagnostic performance of the O-RADS, RMI4, IOTA LR2, and IOTA SR systems by senior and junior doctors.
Guo Y; Zhao B; Zhou S; Wen L; Liu J; Fu Y; Xu F; Liu M
Ultrasonography; 2022 Jul; 41(3):511-518. PubMed ID: 35196832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does Combing O-RADS US and CA-125 Improve Diagnostic Accuracy in Assessing Adnexal Malignancy Risk in Women With Different Menopausal Status?
Wu M; Wang Q; Zhang M; Cao J; Chen Y; Zheng J; Luo L; Su M; Lin X; Kuang X; Zhang X
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Feb; 42(3):675-685. PubMed ID: 35880406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of Ultrasound Scores (Subjective Assessment, Simple Rules Risk Assessment, ADNEX Model, O-RADS) to Adnexal Masses of Difficult Classification.
Pelayo M; Sancho-Sauco J; Sánchez-Zurdo J; Perez-Mies B; Abarca-Martínez L; Cancelo-Hidalgo MJ; Sainz-Bueno JA; Alcázar JL; Pelayo-Delgado I
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 37685323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, IOTA simple rules and O-RADS for assessing the malignant risk of sonographically appearing solid ovarian masses.
Lu B; Liu C; Qi J; He W; Shi T; Zhu Y; Huang B
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Apr; 52(4):102564. PubMed ID: 36868504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
