219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35067570)
1. Lexical Access Changes Based on Listener Needs: Real-Time Word Recognition in Continuous Speech in Cochlear Implant Users.
Smith FX; McMurray B
Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1487-1501. PubMed ID: 35067570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.
McMurray B; Ellis TP; Apfelbaum KS
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):961-980. PubMed ID: 30531260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Waiting for lexical access: Cochlear implants or severely degraded input lead listeners to process speech less incrementally.
McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Rigler H
Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():147-164. PubMed ID: 28917133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Delayed Lexical Access and Cascading Effects on Spreading Semantic Activation During Spoken Word Recognition in Children With Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
Klein KE; Walker EA; McMurray B
Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):338-357. PubMed ID: 36253909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individual Differences in Lexical Access Among Cochlear Implant Users.
Nagels L; Bastiaanse R; Başkent D; Wagner A
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 63(1):286-304. PubMed ID: 31855606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Seedorff M; Rigler H
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e37-51. PubMed ID: 26317298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Recognition of Whispered Speech in Real-Time.
Hendrickson K; Ernest D
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):554-562. PubMed ID: 34582392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.
Richter ME; Chatterjee M
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1727-1740. PubMed ID: 34294630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gated Word Recognition by Postlingually Deafened Adults With Cochlear Implants: Influence of Semantic Context.
Patro C; Mendel LL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 61(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 29242894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.
Farris-Trimble A; McMurray B; Cigrand N; Tomblin JB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):308-27. PubMed ID: 24041330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and cue use in word segmentation for cochlear-implant listeners and normal-hearing listeners presented vocoded speech.
Heffner CC; Jaekel BN; Newman RS; Goupell MJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2936. PubMed ID: 34717484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling open-set spoken word recognition in postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: some preliminary results with the neighborhood activation model.
Meyer TA; Frisch SA; Pisoni DB; Miyamoto RT; Svirsky MA
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jul; 24(4):612-20. PubMed ID: 12851554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contribution of bimodal hearing to lexical tone normalization in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
Luo X; Chang YP; Lin CY; Chang RY
Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():1-8. PubMed ID: 24576834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
O'Neill ER; Parke MN; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1224. PubMed ID: 33639827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Speech-in-Noise Performance in a Large Cohort of Cochlear Implant Users.
Berger JI; Gander PE; Kim S; Schwalje AT; Woo J; Na YM; Holmes A; Hong JM; Dunn CC; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; McMurray B; Griffiths TD; Choi I
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1107-1120. PubMed ID: 37144890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of lexical characteristics and demographic factors on mandarin chinese open-set word recognition in children with cochlear implants.
Liu H; Liu S; Wang S; Liu C; Kong Y; Zhang N; Li S; Yang Y; Han D; Zhang L
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 23086423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition performance among Mandarin-speaking children with normal hearing and cochlear implants.
Wang NM; Wu CM; Kirk KI
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 74(8):883-90. PubMed ID: 20846499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
