These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35067623)
1. The Korea National Patient Safety Incidents Inquiry Survey: Feasibility of Medical Record Review for Detecting Adverse Events in Regional Public Hospitals. Kim MJ; Seo HJ; Koo HM; Ock M; Hwang JI; Lee SI J Patient Saf; 2022 Aug; 18(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 35067623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Korea National Patient Safety Incidents Inquiry Survey: Characteristics of Adverse Events Identified Through Medical Records Review in Regional Public Hospitals. Kim MJ; Seo HJ; Koo HM; Ock M; Hwang JI; Lee SI J Patient Saf; 2022 Aug; 18(5):382-388. PubMed ID: 35948288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Importance of Quality of Medical Record: Differences in Patient Safety Incident Inquiry Results According to Assessment for Quality of Medical Record. Jeong H; Choi EY; Lee W; Jang SG; Pyo J; Ock M J Patient Saf; 2024 Jun; 20(4):229-235. PubMed ID: 38446056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variation between hospitals and reviewers in detection of adverse events identified through medical record review in Korea. Kim S; Shin HG; Jo AEJ; Min A; Ock M; Hwang JI; Jeong Y; Park MS; Lee JB; Chang TIK; Song E; Kim H; Lee SI Int J Qual Health Care; 2020 Nov; 32(8):495-501. PubMed ID: 32696047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing Reliability of Medical Record Reviews for the Detection of Hospital Adverse Events. Ock M; Lee SI; Jo MW; Lee JY; Kim SH J Prev Med Public Health; 2015 Sep; 48(5):239-48. PubMed ID: 26429290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and reliability of a medical record review method identifying transitional patient safety incidents in merged primary and secondary care patients' records. van Melle MA; Zwart DLM; Poldervaart JM; Verkerk OJ; Langelaan M; van Stel HF; de Wit NJ BMJ Open; 2018 Aug; 8(8):e018576. PubMed ID: 30104308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adverse events regional feasibility study: methodological results. Davis P; Lay-Yee R; Schug S; Briant R; Scott A; Johnson S; Bingley W N Z Med J; 2001 May; 114(1131):200-2. PubMed ID: 11421432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates. Thomas EJ; Lipsitz SR; Studdert DM; Brennan TA Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jun; 136(11):812-6. PubMed ID: 12044129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of patient safety: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of adverse event detection with record review. Hanskamp-Sebregts M; Zegers M; Vincent C; van Gurp PJ; de Vet HC; Wollersheim H BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011078. PubMed ID: 27550650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detecting adverse events in Thai hospitals using medical record reviews: agreement among reviewers. Kessomboon P; Panarunothai S; Wongkanaratanakul P J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88(10):1412-8. PubMed ID: 16519388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and Validity of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol for Public Hospitals in Korea. Lee C; Kim SJ; Lee C; Shin E J Prev Med Public Health; 2019 Sep; 52(5):316-322. PubMed ID: 31588701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characteristics associated with the occurrence of adverse events: a retrospective medical record review using the Global Trigger Tool in a fully digitalized tertiary teaching hospital in Korea. Hwang JI; Chin HJ; Chang YS J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Feb; 20(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 23890097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Harvard medical practice study trigger system performance in deceased patients. Klein DO; Rennenberg RJMW; Koopmans RP; Prins MH BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30621689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing patient-reported hospital adverse events with medical record review: do patients know something that hospitals do not? Weissman JS; Schneider EC; Weingart SN; Epstein AM; David-Kasdan J; Feibelmann S; Annas CL; Ridley N; Kirle L; Gatsonis C Ann Intern Med; 2008 Jul; 149(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 18626049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Systematic Review of Methods for Medical Record Analysis to Detect Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients. Klein DO; Rennenberg RJMW; Koopmans RP; Prins MH J Patient Saf; 2021 Dec; 17(8):e1234-e1240. PubMed ID: 32168280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can medical record reviewers reliably identify errors and adverse events in the ED? Klasco RS; Wolfe RE; Lee T; Anderson P; Jacobson LS; Solano J; Edlow J; Grossman SA Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Jun; 34(6):1043-8. PubMed ID: 27055604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The inter-rater agreement of retrospective assessments of adverse events does not improve with two reviewers per patient record. Zegers M; de Bruijne MC; Wagner C; Groenewegen PP; van der Wal G; de Vet HC J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 63(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 19473812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrospective record review in proactive patient safety work - identification of no-harm incidents. Schildmeijer K; Unbeck M; Muren O; Perk J; Pukk Härenstam K; Nilsson L BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Jul; 13():282. PubMed ID: 23876023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]