These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35067623)

  • 61. How to limit the burden of data collection for Quality Indicators based on medical records? The COMPAQH experience.
    Corriol C; Daucourt V; Grenier C; Minvielle E
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Oct; 8():215. PubMed ID: 18940005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Measurement of patient safety: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of adverse event detection with record review].
    Hanskamp-Sebregts M; Zegers M; van Gurp PJ; de Vet HC; Wollersheim H
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2017; 161():D1167. PubMed ID: 28247837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Reliability and validity of judgments concerning adverse events suffered by hospitalized patients.
    Brennan TA; Localio RJ; Laird NL
    Med Care; 1989 Dec; 27(12):1148-58. PubMed ID: 2593729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Adverse event detection by medical record review is reproducible, but the assessment of their preventability is not.
    Klein DO; Rennenberg RJMW; Koopmans RP; Prins MH
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0208087. PubMed ID: 30496243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Assessment of adverse events in medical care: lack of consistency between experienced teams using the global trigger tool.
    Schildmeijer K; Nilsson L; Arestedt K; Perk J
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Apr; 21(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 22362917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Performance characteristics of a methodology to quantify adverse events over time in hospitalized patients.
    Sharek PJ; Parry G; Goldmann D; Bones K; Hackbarth A; Resar R; Griffin FA; Rhoda D; Murphy C; Landrigan CP
    Health Serv Res; 2011 Apr; 46(2):654-78. PubMed ID: 20722749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety incidents.
    Palojoki S; Mäkelä M; Lehtonen L; Saranto K
    Health Informatics J; 2017 Jun; 23(2):134-145. PubMed ID: 26951568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Detection of Adverse Events With the Austrian Inpatient Quality Indicators.
    Schmied M; Buchberger W; Perkhofer D; Kvitsaridze I; Brunner W; Kapferer O; Siebert U
    J Patient Saf; 2024 Sep; 20(6):426-433. PubMed ID: 38771664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Potential value of patient record review to assess and improve patient safety in general practice: A systematic review.
    Madden C; Lydon S; Curran C; Murphy AW; O'Connor P
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2018 Dec; 24(1):192-201. PubMed ID: 30112925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Perception Gaps of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents Between Nurses and the General Public in Korea.
    Choi EY; Pyo J; Lee W; Jang SG; Park YK; Ock M; Lee H
    J Patient Saf; 2021 Dec; 17(8):e971-e975. PubMed ID: 32910040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Measuring hospital adverse events: assessing inter-rater reliability and trigger performance of the Global Trigger Tool.
    Naessens JM; O'Byrne TJ; Johnson MG; Vansuch MB; McGlone CM; Huddleston JM
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2010 Aug; 22(4):266-74. PubMed ID: 20534607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Pilot study on identification of incidents in healthcare transitions and concordance between medical records and patient interview data.
    van Melle MA; Erkelens DC; van Stel HF; de Wit NJ; Zwart DL
    BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011368. PubMed ID: 27543588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Assessing the quality of medication documentation: development and feasibility of the MediDocQ instrument for retrospective chart review in the hospital setting.
    Hammer A; Wagner A; Rieger MA; Manser T;
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e034609. PubMed ID: 31740477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Patient dissatisfaction recorded in hospital notes in New Zealand: their occurrence and pattern.
    Davis P; Lay-Yee R; Briant R
    N Z Med J; 2008 May; 121(1273):51-9. PubMed ID: 18480886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Prevalence and consequences of patient safety incidents in general practice in the Netherlands: a retrospective medical record review study.
    Gaal S; Verstappen W; Wolters R; Lankveld H; van Weel C; Wensing M
    Implement Sci; 2011 Apr; 6():37. PubMed ID: 21470418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A trigger tool fails to identify serious errors and adverse events in pediatric otolaryngology.
    Lander L; Roberson DW; Plummer KM; Forbes PW; Healy GB; Shah RK
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Oct; 143(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 20869555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Adverse events identified by the global trigger tool at a university hospital: A retrospective medical record review.
    Hu Q; Wu B; Zhan M; Jia W; Huang Y; Xu T
    J Evid Based Med; 2019 May; 12(2):91-97. PubMed ID: 30511516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Feasibility of Electronic Health Record-Based Triggers in Detecting Dental Adverse Events.
    Kalenderian E; Obadan-Udoh E; Yansane A; Kent K; Hebballi NB; Delattre V; Kookal KK; Tokede O; White J; Walji MF
    Appl Clin Inform; 2018 Jul; 9(3):646-653. PubMed ID: 30134473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Large scale organisational intervention to improve patient safety in four UK hospitals: mixed method evaluation.
    Benning A; Ghaleb M; Suokas A; Dixon-Woods M; Dawson J; Barber N; Franklin BD; Girling A; Hemming K; Carmalt M; Rudge G; Naicker T; Nwulu U; Choudhury S; Lilford R
    BMJ; 2011 Feb; 342():d195. PubMed ID: 21292719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.