131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35068359)
1. Are proactive employees proactive performers? the moderating role of supervisor-subordinate marital status similarity.
Wang X; Zheng XJ; Luo J; Zhao S
J Soc Psychol; 2023 Sep; 163(5):623-636. PubMed ID: 35068359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Support from the top: supervisors' perceived organizational support as a moderator of leader-member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships.
Erdogan B; Enders J
J Appl Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(2):321-30. PubMed ID: 17371081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining How Ambidextrous Leadership Relates to Affective Commitment and Workplace Deviance Behavior of Employees: The Moderating Role of Supervisor-Subordinate Exchange
Wu M; Wang R; He P; Estay C; Akram Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(15):. PubMed ID: 32751465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supervisors' upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment.
Zhou L; Wang M; Chen G; Shi J
J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 22082457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: a relational perspective.
Li N; Liang J; Crant JM
J Appl Psychol; 2010 Mar; 95(2):395-404. PubMed ID: 20230079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In Leaders We Trust, or Should We? Supervisors' Dark Triad Personality Traits and Ratings of Team Performance and Innovation.
Fodor OC; Curşeu PL; Meslec N
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():650172. PubMed ID: 34194361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inclusive Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: Examination of LMX Perspective in Small Capitalized Textile Firms.
Javed B; Khan AK; Quratulain S
J Psychol; 2018; 152(8):594-612. PubMed ID: 30260768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treat me better, but is it really better? Applying a resource perspective to understanding leader-member exchange (LMX), LMX differentiation, and work stress.
Liang Y; Liu Y; Park Y; Wang L
J Occup Health Psychol; 2022 Apr; 27(2):223-239. PubMed ID: 34807679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are Empowered Employees More Proactive? The Contingency of How They Evaluate Their Leader.
Yin K; Xing L; Li C; Guo Y
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1802. PubMed ID: 29163249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Leader-member exchange: Moderating the health and safety outcomes of job insecurity.
Probst TM; Jiang L; Graso M
J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():47-56. PubMed ID: 26875165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disability Severity, Leader-Member Exchange, and Attitudinal Outcomes: Considering the Employee and Supervisor Perspectives.
Lyubykh Z; Ansari MA; Williams-Whitt K; Kristman VL
J Occup Rehabil; 2020 Dec; 30(4):613-623. PubMed ID: 32146643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In the shadow of the boss's boss: effects of supervisors' upward exchange relationships on employees.
Tangirala S; Green SG; Ramanujam R
J Appl Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(2):309-20. PubMed ID: 17371080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of Leader Narcissism on Career Success of Employees: An Interpersonal Relationship Perspective.
Wang H; Li D; Wu L; Ding Z
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():679427. PubMed ID: 34987439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proactive Personality and Employee Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Model of Multisource Information Exchange and LMX.
Zhang A; Li X; Guo Y
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():552581. PubMed ID: 34276456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Relation Between Supervisors' Big Five Personality Traits and Employees' Experiences of Abusive Supervision.
Camps J; Stouten J; Euwema M
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():112. PubMed ID: 26903919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supervisor-subordinate fit need for autonomy and subordinate job crafting: a moderated mediation model.
Dutta K; Fuller B; Bajaba S
J Soc Psychol; 2023 Apr; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 37057748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are proactive personalities always beneficial? Political skill as a moderator.
Sun S; van Emmerik HI
J Appl Psychol; 2015 May; 100(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 25180658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What happens during annual appraisal interviews? How leader-follower interactions unfold and impact interview outcomes.
Meinecke AL; Lehmann-Willenbrock N; Kauffeld S
J Appl Psychol; 2017 Jul; 102(7):1054-1074. PubMed ID: 28358531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Social Comparisons, Self-Conceptions, and Attributions: Assessing the Self-Related Contingencies in Leader-Member Exchange Relationships.
Lapointe É; Vandenberghe C; Ben Ayed AK; Schwarz G; Tremblay M; Chenevert D
J Bus Psychol; 2020; 35(3):381-402. PubMed ID: 32624640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Support or Suppress? Research on the Mechanism of Employee's GNS on Innovation Performance: From the Perspective of Status Competition.
Tang Y; Ding Z; Hu X; Tao R
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():895266. PubMed ID: 35814156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
