These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35069092)

  • 1. Finite Element Modeling of Magnitude and Location of Brain Micromotion Induced Strain for Intracortical Implants.
    Al Abed A; Amatoury J; Khraiche M
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():727715. PubMed ID: 35069092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compliant intracortical implants reduce strains and strain rates in brain tissue in vivo.
    Sridharan A; Nguyen JK; Capadona JR; Muthuswamy J
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Jun; 12(3):036002. PubMed ID: 25834105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A finite-element model of the mechanical effects of implantable microelectrodes in the cerebral cortex.
    Subbaroyan J; Martin DC; Kipke DR
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Dec; 2(4):103-13. PubMed ID: 16317234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Micromotion-induced strain fields influence early stages of repair at bone-implant interfaces.
    Wazen RM; Currey JA; Guo H; Brunski JB; Helms JA; Nanci A
    Acta Biomater; 2013 May; 9(5):6663-74. PubMed ID: 23337705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of bone density and crestal cortical bone thickness on micromotion and peri-implant bone strain distribution in an immediately loaded implant: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Sugiura T; Yamamoto K; Horita S; Murakami K; Tsutsumi S; Kirita T
    J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2016 Jun; 46(3):152-65. PubMed ID: 27382504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an
    Sugiura T; Yamamoto K; Horita S; Murakami K; Tsutsumi S; Kirita T
    J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2017 Aug; 47(4):251-262. PubMed ID: 28861289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of flexible polymer interconnects in chronic tissue response induced by intracortical microelectrodes--a modeling and an in vivo study.
    Subbaroyan J; Kipke DR
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():3588-91. PubMed ID: 17947041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Micromotion analysis of different implant configuration, bone density, and crestal cortical bone thickness in immediately loaded mandibular full-arch implant restorations: A nonlinear finite element study.
    Sugiura T; Yamamoto K; Horita S; Murakami K; Kirita T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 29214714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of implant orientation and implant material on tibia bone strain, implant-bone micromotion, contact pressure, and wear depth due to total ankle replacement.
    Mondal S; Ghosh R
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Mar; 233(3):318-331. PubMed ID: 30663509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing stability at the interface between a porous surface and cancellous bone: a finite element analysis of a canine in vivo micromotion experiment.
    Ramamurti BS; Orr TE; Bragdon CR; Lowenstein JD; Jasty M; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Aug; 36(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 9261690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt-Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis.
    Tobar-Reyes J; Andueza-Castro L; Jiménez-Silva A; Bustamante-Plaza R; Carvajal-Herrera J
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2021 Aug; 7(4):581-590. PubMed ID: 34042328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress distribution and microgap formation in angulated zirconia abutments with a titanium base in narrow diameter implants: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Zhang Y; Yu P; Yu H
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Jul; 38(7):e3610. PubMed ID: 35490303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of joint load, motions and contact stress and bone-implant interface micromotion of three implant designs for total ankle arthroplasty.
    Zhang Y; Chen Z; Zhao H; Zhao D; Zhang X; Ma X; Jin Z
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Aug; 223():106976. PubMed ID: 35785557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of cortical bone thickness and implant length on bone strain and interfacial micromotion in an immediately loaded implant.
    Tu MG; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Lin DJ; Huang HL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):706-14. PubMed ID: 20657865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element analysis of the effect of framework materials at the bone-implant interface in the all-on-four implant system.
    Kelkar KC; Bhat V; Hegde C
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2021; 18():1. PubMed ID: 34084288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A three dimensional in vitro glial scar model to investigate the local strain effects from micromotion around neural implants.
    Spencer KC; Sy JC; Falcón-Banchs R; Cima MJ
    Lab Chip; 2017 Feb; 17(5):795-804. PubMed ID: 28119969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of muscle forces and gait cycle discretization when assessing acetabular cup primary stability: A finite element study.
    Fallahnezhad K; O'Rourke D; Bahl JS; Thewlis D; Taylor M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Mar; 230():107351. PubMed ID: 36709556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
    Engh CA; O'Connor D; Jasty M; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distribution of micromotion in implants and alveolar bone with different thread profiles in immediate loading: a finite element study.
    Chang PK; Chen YC; Huang CC; Lu WH; Chen YC; Tsai HH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):e96-101. PubMed ID: 23189316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Micromotion of Dental Implants: Basic Mechanical Considerations.
    Winter W; Klein D; Karl M
    J Med Eng; 2013; 2013():265412. PubMed ID: 27017916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.