These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35070125)

  • 21. Bonding Efficacy of a New Self-Adhesive Restorative onto Flat Dentin vs Class-I Cavity-bottom Dentin.
    Yao C; Ahmed MH; Okazaki Y; Van Landuyt KL; Huang C; Van Meerbeek B
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 32030377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Commercially Available Esthetic Restorative Composite Materials: An
    Preethy NA; Jeevanandan G; Govindaraju L; Subramanian E
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(6):635-639. PubMed ID: 33976488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of Effect of Dietary Solvents on Bond Strength of Compomer, Ormocer, Nanocomposite and Activa Bioactive Restorative Materials.
    Sahoo SK; Meshram GR; Parihar AS; Pitalia D; Vasudevan H; Surana A
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2019; 9(5):453-457. PubMed ID: 31620377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Materials to Primary Tooth Dentin Treated with Silver Diamine Fluoride.
    Abdullah A; Finkelman M; Kang Y; Loo CY
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2022 May; 89(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 35986478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of adhesives and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of a nano-composite to coronal and root dentin.
    Korkmaz Y; Gurgan S; Firat E; Nathanson D
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):522-9. PubMed ID: 20945743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Resin Composite.
    Sibai N; El Mourad A; Al Suhaibani N; Al Ahmadi R; Al Dosary S
    Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():6280624. PubMed ID: 35572356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of the Contents of Various Solvents in One-step Self-etch Adhesives on Shear Bond Strengths to Enamel and Dentin.
    Ageel FA; Alqahtani MQ
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Nov; 20(11):1260-1268. PubMed ID: 31892676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interfacial Bond Strength and Morphology of Sound and Caries-affected Dentin Surfaces Bonded to Two Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cements.
    Al-Hasan RM; Al-Taee LA
    Oper Dent; 2022 Jul; 47(4):E188-E196. PubMed ID: 35917246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative evaluation of a bioactive restorative material with resin modified glass ionomer for calcium-ion release and shear bond strength to dentin of primary teeth-an
    Bhatia K; Nayak R; Ginjupalli K
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022 Nov; 46(6):25-32. PubMed ID: 36624901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative evaluation of compressive strength and surface microhardness of EQUIA Forte, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement with conventional glass-ionomer cement.
    Poornima P; Koley P; Kenchappa M; Nagaveni NB; Bharath KP; Neena IE
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(3):265-270. PubMed ID: 31584026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of Antibacterial Agents on Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Materials.
    Abuljadayel R; Aljadani N; Almutairi H; Turkistani A
    Polymers (Basel); 2023 Jun; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 37376257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fluoride release and re-release from a bioactive restorative material.
    May E; Donly KJ
    Am J Dent; 2017 Dec; 30(6):305-308. PubMed ID: 29251452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fluoride Release from Glass Ionomer with Nano Filled Coat and Varnish.
    Brzović-Rajić V; Miletić I; Gurgan S; Peroš K; Verzak Ž; Ivanišević-Malčić A
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 2018 Dec; 52(4):307-313. PubMed ID: 30666061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of Bioinductive Cavity Liners on Shear Bond Strength of Dental Composite to Dentin.
    Tohidkhah S; Ahmadi E; Abbasi M; Morvaridi Farimani R; Ranjbar Omrani L
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():3283211. PubMed ID: 35342752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of F, Ca, and P release and microhardness of eleven ion-leaching restorative materials and the recharge efficacy using a new Ca/P containing fluoride varnish.
    Ruengrungsom C; Burrow MF; Parashos P; Palamara JEA
    J Dent; 2020 Nov; 102():103474. PubMed ID: 32941973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and modes of failure of five different reinforced glass ionomer restorative cements to TheraCal LC: An
    Umale KG; Gade VJ; Raut AW
    J Conserv Dent Endod; 2024 Feb; 27(2):200-204. PubMed ID: 38463478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
    Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Shear Bond Strength and Bonding Properties of Orthodontic and nano Adhesives: A Comparative
    Bilal R; Arjumand B
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(4):600-604. PubMed ID: 32792817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material.
    Benetti AR; Michou S; Larsen L; Peutzfeldt A; Pallesen U; van Dijken JWV
    Biomater Investig Dent; 2019; 6(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 31998876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.