These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35070174)

  • 1. Stability of dental implants with sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) and modified (SLActive) surfaces during the osseointegration period.
    Sayin Ozel G; Inan O; Secilmis Acar A; Alniacik Iyidogan G; Dolanmaz D; Yildirim G
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2021; 15(4):226-231. PubMed ID: 35070174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.
    Lee JT; Cho SA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of standard (SLA) and modified sandblasted and acid-etched (SLActive) dental implants in promoting immediate and/or early occlusal loading protocols: a systematic review of prospective studies.
    Chambrone L; Shibli JA; Mercúrio CE; Cardoso B; Preshaw PM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Apr; 26(4):359-370. PubMed ID: 24814519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monitoring bone morphogenetic protein-2 and -7, soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand and osteoprotegerin levels in the peri-implant sulcular fluid during the osseointegration of hydrophilic-modified sandblasted acid-etched and sandblasted acid-etched surface dental implants.
    Dolanmaz D; Saglam M; Inan O; Dundar N; Alniacık G; Gursoy Trak B; Kocak E; Hakki SS
    J Periodontal Res; 2015 Feb; 50(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 24697526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized clinical study of the peri-implant healing to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in patients receiving anticoagulants.
    Marković A; Đinić A; Calvo Guirado JL; Tahmaseb A; Šćepanović M; Janjić B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Oct; 28(10):1241-1247. PubMed ID: 27539149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15-month evaluation.
    Karabuda ZC; Abdel-Haq J; Arisan V
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):840-9. PubMed ID: 21198901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface Modifications of Commercial Dental Implant Systems: An Overview.
    Sivaswamy V; Bahl V
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2023; 33(2):71-77. PubMed ID: 36734929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of a Novel Surface of Bioactive Implants on Osseointegration: A Comparative and Histomorfometric Correlation and Implant Stability Study in Minipigs.
    Romero-Ruiz MM; Gil-Mur FJ; Ríos-Santos JV; Lázaro-Calvo P; Ríos-Carrasco B; Herrero-Climent M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 May; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 31075984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resonance frequency analysis of 208 Straumann dental implants during the healing period.
    Guler AU; Sumer M; Duran I; Sandikci EO; Telcioglu NT
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 22103915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter.
    Han J; Lulic M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jun; 21(6):605-11. PubMed ID: 20666787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Osseointegration of SLActive implants in diabetic pigs.
    Schlegel KA; Prechtl C; Möst T; Seidl C; Lutz R; von Wilmowsky C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Feb; 24(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 22111960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resonance frequency analysis as a reliable criterion for early loading of sandblasted/acid-etched active surface implants placed by the osteotome sinus floor elevation technique.
    Marković A; Colić S; Drazić R; Gacić B; Todorović A; Stajcić Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):718-24. PubMed ID: 21841979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The early loading of different surface-modified implants: a randomized clinical trial.
    Körmöczi K; Komlós G; Papócsi P; Horváth F; Joób-Fancsaly Á
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Apr; 21(1):207. PubMed ID: 33902551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles.
    Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Osseointegration in Novel Laser-Textured and SLA Implants.
    Zarazir R; Mrad S; Aoun G; Sleiman AA; Mousallem M; Bassil J
    Acta Inform Med; 2023 Jun; 31(2):137-140. PubMed ID: 37711484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: five-year follow-up.
    Nack C; Raguse JD; Stricker A; Nelson K; Nahles S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Jan; 42(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 25231029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Secondary stability achieved in dental implants with a calcium-coated sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surface and a chemically modified SLA surface placed without mechanical engagement: A preclinical study.
    Song YW; Paeng KW; Kim MJ; Cha JK; Jung UW; Jung RE; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1474-1483. PubMed ID: 34547819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early loading at 21 days of non-submerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in the posterior mandible.
    Bornstein MM; Wittneben JG; Brägger U; Buser D
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jun; 81(6):809-18. PubMed ID: 20450357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur.
    Park JW; Kwon TG; Suh JY
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 22409778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Excessive occlusal load on chemically modified and moderately rough titanium implants restored with cantilever reconstructions. An experimental study in dogs.
    Lima LA; Bosshardt DD; Chambrone L; Araújo MG; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1142-1154. PubMed ID: 31529643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.