159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35072237)
21. Improving the performance of IOTA simple rules: sonographic assessment of adnexal masses with resource-effective use of a magnetic resonance scoring (ADNEX MR scoring system).
Pereira PN; Sarian LO; Yoshida A; Araújo KG; Silva ACB; de Oliveira Barros RH; Jales RM; Derchain S
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Oct; 45(10):3218-3229. PubMed ID: 31482379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. IOTA simple rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: prospective external validation.
Alcázar JL; Pascual MÁ; Olartecoechea B; Graupera B; Aubá M; Ajossa S; Hereter L; Julve R; Gastón B; Peddes C; Sedda F; Piras A; Saba L; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 42(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 23576304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surgical outcomes of adnexal masses classified by IOTA ultrasound simple rules.
Carballo EV; Maturen KE; Li Z; Patel-Lippmann KK; Wasnik AP; Sadowski EA; Barroilhet LM
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21848. PubMed ID: 36528698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ultrasound-based logistic regression model LR2 versus magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.
Shimada K; Matsumoto K; Mimura T; Ishikawa T; Munechika J; Ohgiya Y; Kushima M; Hirose Y; Asami Y; Iitsuka C; Miyamoto S; Onuki M; Tsunoda H; Matsuoka R; Ichizuka K; Sekizawa A
Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 29236181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. IOTA Simple Ultrasound Rules for Triage of Adnexal Mass: Experience from South India.
Shetty J; Saradha A; Pandey D; Bhat R; Pratap Kumar ; Bharatnur S
J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2019 Aug; 69(4):356-362. PubMed ID: 31391744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents Can Accurately Classify Benign Ovarian Tumors Using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Rules.
Sebajuri JMV; Magriples U; Small M; Ntasumbumuyange D; Rulisa S; Bazzett-Matabele L
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Jul; 39(7):1389-1393. PubMed ID: 32012337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of IOTA simple rules for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: meta-analysis.
Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Naftalin J; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 44(5):503-14. PubMed ID: 24920435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic Accuracy of Biomarkers and International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules in Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer.
Haliti TI; Hoxha I; Mojsiu R; Mandal R; Goç G; Hoti KD
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2024 Feb; 38(1):251-265. PubMed ID: 37537110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Xie WT; Wang YQ; Xiang ZS; Du ZS; Huang SX; Chen YJ; Tang LN
J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35067220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adnexal masses: Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the simple rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.
Xu A; Nie F; Liu T; Dong T; Bu L; Yang D
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Jun; 157(3):568-573. PubMed ID: 34510439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Timmerman D; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Fruscio R; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Pascual MA; Testa AC; Ameye L; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):324-334. PubMed ID: 32853459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meys EM; Kaijser J; Kruitwagen RF; Slangen BF; Van Calster B; Aertgeerts B; Verbakel JY; Timmerman D; Van Gorp T
Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 58():17-29. PubMed ID: 26922169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sonographic Assessment of Complex Ultrasound Morphology Adnexal Tumors in Pregnant Women with the Use of IOTA Simple Rules Risk and ADNEX Scoring Systems.
Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smoleń A; Kluz T; Łoziński T; Miturski A; Kraczkowski J
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Feb; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33671023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.
Stukan M; Badocha M; Ratajczak K
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):564. PubMed ID: 31185938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of Human Epididymis Protein 4, Cancer Antigen 125, and Ultrasound Prediction Model in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Adnexal Masses.
Bahadur A; Bhattacharya N; Mundhra R; Khoiwal K; Chawla L; Singh R; Naithani M; Kishore S
J Midlife Health; 2023; 14(3):176-183. PubMed ID: 38312761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [External validation of simple ultrasound rules of Timmerman on 122 ovarian tumors].
Fathallah K; Huchon C; Bats AS; Metzger U; Lefrère-Belda MA; Bensaid C; Lécuru F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Sep; 39(9):477-81. PubMed ID: 21820936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Two-Step Strategy for Optimizing the Preoperative Classification of Adnexal Masses in a University Hospital, Using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Models: Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model.
Esquivel Villabona AL; Rodríguez JN; Ayala N; Buriticá C; Gómez AC; Velandia AM; Rodríguez N; Alcázar JL
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Feb; 41(2):471-482. PubMed ID: 33890698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
