215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35072805)
1. An optimal intervention threshold of FRAX in postmenopausal Thai women.
Sribenjalak D; Charoensri S; Pongchaiyakul C
Arch Osteoporos; 2022 Jan; 17(1):21. PubMed ID: 35072805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Setting the new FRAX reference threshold without bone mineral density in Chinese postmenopausal women.
Liu S; Chen R; Ding N; Wang Q; Huang M; Liu H; Xie Z; Ou Y; Sheng Z
J Endocrinol Invest; 2021 Feb; 44(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 32495298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FRAX® based intervention thresholds for management of osteoporosis in Singaporean women.
Chandran M; McCloskey EV; Thu WPP; Logan S; Hao Y; Tay D; Ang WC; Aung TKK; Choo KS; Ali A; Yan SX; Huang XF; Liu XM; Yong EL; Lekamwasam S
Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Nov; 13(1):130. PubMed ID: 30456726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FRAX score with and without bone mineral density: a comparison and factors affecting the discordance in osteoporosis treatment in Thais.
Teeratakulpisarn N; Charoensri S; Theerakulpisut D; Pongchaiyakul C
Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Feb; 16(1):44. PubMed ID: 33635451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.
Oka R; Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I
Endocr J; 2018 Feb; 65(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 29151451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The proportion of Thai postmenopausal women who would be eligible for anti-osteoporosis therapy.
Chanidkul P; Sribenjalak D; Charoenngam N; Pongchaiyakul C
PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0279829. PubMed ID: 36735672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Underestimated fracture risk in postmenopausal women-application of the hybrid intervention threshold.
Wang Y; Yu S; Hsu C; Tsai C; Cheng T
Osteoporos Int; 2020 Mar; 31(3):475-483. PubMed ID: 31696272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) Results Calculated With and Without Bone Mineral Density Values for the Evaluation of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia.
Imerci A; Yalın Kılınç C; Aydogan NH; Karalezli MN; Savran A
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(4):464-471. PubMed ID: 28781230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FRAX® with or without BMD and TBS predicts fragility fractures in community-dwelling rural southern Indian postmenopausal women.
Rajan R; Paul J; Cherian KE; Asha HS; Kapoor N; Paul TV
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jun; 15(1):82. PubMed ID: 32483672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to predict need for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning in postmenopausal women.
Chao AS; Chen FP; Lin YC; Huang TS; Fan CM; Yu YW
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 54(6):722-5. PubMed ID: 26700992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between osteoporotic fracture risk in Brazilian postmenopausal women calculated using the FRAX with and without the inclusion of bone densitometry data.
Bastos-Silva Y; Aguiar LB; Pinto-Neto AM; Baccaro LF; Costa-Paiva L
Arch Osteoporos; 2016; 11():16. PubMed ID: 27067597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early postmenopausal women: sensitivity of the WHO FRAX tool.
Trémollieres FA; Pouillès JM; Drewniak N; Laparra J; Ribot CA; Dargent-Molina P
J Bone Miner Res; 2010 May; 25(5):1002-9. PubMed ID: 20200927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX.
Kälvesten J; Lui LY; Brismar T; Cummings S
Bone; 2016 May; 86():30-5. PubMed ID: 26921822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the validity of osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment tools (IOF One Minute Test, SCORE, and FRAX) in postmenopausal Palestinian women.
Kharroubi A; Saba E; Ghannam I; Darwish H
Arch Osteoporos; 2017 Dec; 12(1):6. PubMed ID: 28013446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revised FRAX®-based intervention thresholds for the management of osteoporosis among postmenopausal women in Sri Lanka.
Lekamwasam S; Chandran M; Subasinghe S
Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Mar; 14(1):33. PubMed ID: 30850909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of OSTA, FRAX and BMI for Predicting Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in a Han Population in Beijing: A Cross Sectional Study.
Fan Z; Li X; Zhang X; Yang Y; Fei Q; Guo A
Clin Interv Aging; 2020; 15():1171-1180. PubMed ID: 32764904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FRAX without BMD can be used to risk-stratify Veterans who recently sustained a low trauma non-vertebral/non-hip fracture.
Sagalla N; Colón-Emeric C; Sloane R; Lyles K; Vognsen J; Lee R
Osteoporos Int; 2021 Mar; 32(3):467-472. PubMed ID: 32885318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. US Preventative Services Task Force FRAX threshold has a low sensitivity to detect osteoporosis in women ages 50-64 years.
Bansal S; Pecina JL; Merry SP; Kennel KA; Maxson J; Quigg S; Thacher TD
Osteoporos Int; 2015 Apr; 26(4):1429-33. PubMed ID: 25614141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement between FRAX scores calculated with and without bone mineral density in women with osteopenia in Turkey.
Olmez Sarikaya N; Kapar Yavasi S; Tan G; Satiroglu S; Yildiz AH; Oz B; Yoleri O; Memis A
Clin Rheumatol; 2014 Dec; 33(12):1785-9. PubMed ID: 24474067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
