These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35072855)

  • 1. Validation of the SITA faster strategy for the management of glaucoma.
    Rodríguez-Agirretxe I; Loizate E; Astorkiza B; Onaindia A; Galdos-Olasagasti L; Basasoro A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 42(8):2347-2354. PubMed ID: 35072855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma.
    Lavanya R; Riyazuddin M; Dasari S; Puttaiah NK; Venugopal JP; Pradhan ZS; Devi S; Sreenivasaiah S; Ganeshrao SB; Rao HL
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Sep; 29(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 32459685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 24-2 Faster, Fast, and Standard Programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for Perimetry in Patients With Manifest and Suspect Glaucoma.
    Thulasidas M; Patyal S
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 32890104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frontloading SITA-Faster Can Increase Frequency and Reliability of Visual Field Testing at Minimal Time Cost.
    Tan JCK; Kalloniatis M; Phu J
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):445-456. PubMed ID: 36958625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 24-2 SITA Standard versus 24-2 SITA Faster in Perimetry-Naive Normal Subjects.
    Costa VP; Zangalli CS; Jammal AA; Medeiros FA; Miyazaki JVMK; Perez V; Nardi Boscaroli ML; Schimiti RB
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 35985477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Consistency of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects Using a Clustered SITA-Faster Protocol.
    Tan JCK; Phu J; Go D; Nguyen D; Masselos K; Bank A; Kalloniatis M; Agar A
    Ophthalmology; 2023 Nov; 130(11):1138-1148. PubMed ID: 37385298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment.
    Katz J
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Feb; 106(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 9951496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of the visual field index in glaucoma patients with moderately advanced visual field loss.
    Lee JM; Cirineo N; Ramanathan M; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Morales E; Coleman AL; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 24200229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Nishida T; Eslani M; Weinreb RN; Arias J; Vasile C; Mohammadzadeh V; Moghimi S
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Feb; 32(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 36223309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.
    Capris P; Autuori S; Capris E; Papadia M
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18320509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing Static Perimetry Protocols of Central Field Testing among Patients with Glaucoma.
    Behera G; Nath A; Ramasamy A; Kaliaperumal S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Jun; 100(6):406-411. PubMed ID: 37129640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative quantification of focal and diffuse visual field loss by the SPARK Precision threshold algorithm and SITA.
    Foo SK; Cubbidge RP; Heitmar R
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Jun; 260(6):1983-1993. PubMed ID: 34962591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Strategy for Seeding Point Error Assessment for Retesting (SPEAR) in Perimetry Applied to Normal Subjects, Glaucoma Suspects, and Patients With Glaucoma.
    Phu J; Kalloniatis M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 221():115-130. PubMed ID: 32777379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.
    Newkirk MR; Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Prea SM; Kong YXG; Mehta A; He M; Crowston JG; Gupta V; Martin KR; Vingrys AJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 190():9-16. PubMed ID: 29550190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Severity Indices.
    Kang EM; Hong S; Kim CY; Seong GJ
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 26240511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Converting to SITA-standard from full-threshold visual field testing in the follow-up phase of a clinical trial.
    Musch DC; Gillespie BW; Motyka BM; Niziol LM; Mills RP; Lichter PR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 46(8):2755-9. PubMed ID: 16043847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Detect Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Based on Spatial Pattern Analysis.
    Wang M; Shen LQ; Pasquale LR; Petrakos P; Formica S; Boland MV; Wellik SR; De Moraes CG; Myers JS; Saeedi O; Wang H; Baniasadi N; Li D; Tichelaar J; Bex PJ; Elze T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2019 Jan; 60(1):365-375. PubMed ID: 30682206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet.
    Gupta V; Kong GXY; Singh A; Panigrahi A; Gupta S; Prea S; Vingrys AJ
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 May; 13(5):10. PubMed ID: 38743410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Evaluation of Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm-Faster Compared With Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm-Standard in Normal Subjects, Glaucoma Suspects, and Patients With Glaucoma.
    Phu J; Khuu SK; Agar A; Kalloniatis M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 208():251-264. PubMed ID: 31470001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.