166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35072906)
21. Neutral theory: applicability and neutrality of using generic health-related quality of life tools in diseases or conditions where specific tools are available.
Jandhyala R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):86. PubMed ID: 33902436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparing EQ-5D valuation studies: a systematic review and methodological reporting checklist.
Xie F; Gaebel K; Perampaladas K; Doble B; Pullenayegum E
Med Decis Making; 2014 Jan; 34(1):8-20. PubMed ID: 23525701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validation and comparison of 15-D and EQ-5D-5L instruments in a Spanish Parkinson's disease population sample.
García-Gordillo M; del Pozo-Cruz B; Adsuar JC; Sánchez-Martínez FI; Abellán-Perpiñán JM
Qual Life Res; 2014 May; 23(4):1315-26. PubMed ID: 24258254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Validity of EQ-5D utility index and minimal clinically important difference estimation among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Bae E; Choi SE; Lee H; Shin G; Kang D
BMC Pulm Med; 2020 Mar; 20(1):73. PubMed ID: 32293387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A systematic literature review to compare quality of life in psoriasis with other chronic diseases using EQ-5D-derived utility values.
Møller AH; Erntoft S; Vinding GR; Jemec GB
Patient Relat Outcome Meas; 2015; 6():167-77. PubMed ID: 26185476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.
Cheung PWH; Wong CKH; Cheung JPY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):E679-E686. PubMed ID: 30475342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluating a falls prevention intervention in older home care recipients: a comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D.
Bjerk M; Brovold T; Davis JC; Bergland A
Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3187-3195. PubMed ID: 31364036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms.
McCaffrey N; Kaambwa B; Currow DC; Ratcliffe J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Sep; 14(1):133. PubMed ID: 27644755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey.
Longworth L; Yang Y; Young T; Mulhern B; Hernández Alava M; Mukuria C; Rowen D; Tosh J; Tsuchiya A; Evans P; Devianee Keetharuth A; Brazier J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(9):1-224. PubMed ID: 24524660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimating Cost-Effectiveness Using Alternative Preference-Based Scores and Within-Trial Methods: Exploring the Dynamics of the Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Using the EQ-5D 5-Level Version and Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index.
Franklin M; Hunter RM; Enrique A; Palacios J; Richards D
Value Health; 2022 Jun; 25(6):1018-1029. PubMed ID: 35667775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Psychometric Properties of the EQ-5D for the Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in the Population of Middle-Old and Oldest-Old Persons: Study Protocol for a Systematic Review.
Gottschalk S; König HH; Nejad M; Dams J
Front Public Health; 2020; 8():578073. PubMed ID: 33194977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Estimating the relationship between preference-based generic utility instruments and disease-specific quality-of-life measures in severe chronic constipation: challenges in practice.
Parker M; Haycox A; Graves J
Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Aug; 29(8):719-30. PubMed ID: 21635017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the Health-Related Quality of Life of Australian Adolescents: An Empirical Comparison of the Child Health Utility 9D and EQ-5D-Y Instruments.
Chen G; Flynn T; Stevens K; Brazier J; Huynh E; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Ratcliffe J
Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 26091597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quality of life in older adults following a hip fracture: an empirical comparison of the ICECAP-O and the EQ-5D-3 L instruments.
Milte R; Crotty M; Miller MD; Whitehead C; Ratcliffe J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Sep; 16(1):173. PubMed ID: 30185193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The estimation of a preference-based single index for the IBS-QoL by mapping to the EQ-5D-5L in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.
Sturkenboom R; Keszthelyi D; Brandts L; Weerts ZZRM; Snijkers JTW; Masclee AAM; Essers BAB
Qual Life Res; 2022 Apr; 31(4):1209-1221. PubMed ID: 34546554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Converting Parkinson-Specific Scores into Health State Utilities to Assess Cost-Utility Analysis.
Chen G; Garcia-Gordillo MA; Collado-Mateo D; Del Pozo-Cruz B; Adsuar JC; Cordero-Ferrera JM; Abellán-Perpiñán JM; Sánchez-Martínez FI
Patient; 2018 Dec; 11(6):665-675. PubMed ID: 29876865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. EQ-5D-3L health state utility values in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients in Malaysia: a cross-sectional assessment.
Shafie AA; Chhabra IK; Wong JHY; Mohammed NS
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Jan; 19(1):10. PubMed ID: 33413416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Review of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online database.
Dakin H
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2013 Sep; 11():151. PubMed ID: 24010873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How Should We Capture Health State Utility in Dementia? Comparisons of DEMQOL-Proxy-U and of Self- and Proxy-Completed EQ-5D-5L.
Martin A; Meads D; Griffiths AW; Surr CA
Value Health; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1417-1426. PubMed ID: 31806199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The responsiveness of EQ-5D utility scores in patients with depression: A comparison with instruments measuring quality of life, psychopathology and social functioning.
Günther OH; Roick C; Angermeyer MC; König HH
J Affect Disord; 2008 Jan; 105(1-3):81-91. PubMed ID: 17532051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
