These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35073221)

  • 1. Weekly near-peer tutoring sessions improve students' performance on basic medical sciences and USMLE Step1 examinations.
    Khalil MK
    Med Teach; 2022 Jul; 44(7):752-757. PubMed ID: 35073221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attendance of Near-Peer Tutoring Sessions Improves Academic Performance of First-Year Medical Students.
    Khalil MK; Wright WS
    Med Sci Educ; 2022 Dec; 32(6):1433-1438. PubMed ID: 36532386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of near-peer tutoring on medical students' performance in anatomical and physiological sciences.
    Morgan KM; Northey EE; Khalil MK
    Clin Anat; 2017 Oct; 30(7):922-928. PubMed ID: 28726243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to: Weekly near-peer tutoring sessions improve students' performance on basic medical sciences and USMLE Step1 examinations.
    Fujikawa H; Eto M
    Med Teach; 2023 Jan; 45(1):114-115. PubMed ID: 35260033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between students' performances on the NBME Comprehensive Basic Science Examination and the USMLE Step 1: a longitudinal investigation at one school.
    Glew RH; Ripkey DR; Swanson DB
    Acad Med; 1997 Dec; 72(12):1097-102. PubMed ID: 9435717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does regular attendance in supplemental virtual near-peer tutoring in anatomy laboratory content improve anatomy performance for medical students?
    Doty JE; Thompson NE
    Anat Sci Educ; 2024; 17(3):455-461. PubMed ID: 38183170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Growth in basic science knowledge in first-year medical school and USMLE Step 1 results: a longitudinal investigation at one school.
    Wang L; Laird-Fick H; Parker C; Liao Z; Solomon D
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2022 Aug; 27(3):605-619. PubMed ID: 35254547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning and study strategies correlate with medical students' performance in anatomical sciences.
    Khalil MK; Williams SE; Gregory Hawkins H
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):236-242. PubMed ID: 28940743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender differences in learning and study strategies impact medical students' preclinical and USMLE step 1 examination performance.
    Saxena S; Wright WS; Khalil MK
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):504. PubMed ID: 38714975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do peer-tutors perform better in examinations? An analysis of medical school final examination results.
    Iwata K; Furmedge DS; Sturrock A; Gill D
    Med Educ; 2014 Jul; 48(7):698-704. PubMed ID: 24909531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of the NBME Comprehensive Basic Science Examination as a progress test in the preclerkship curriculum of a new medical school.
    Johnson TR; Khalil MK; Peppler RD; Davey DD; Kibble JD
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Dec; 38(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 25434014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Markov chain model to evaluate medical students' trajectory on progress tests and predict USMLE step 1 scores---a retrospective cohort study in one medical school.
    Wang L; Laird-Fick HS; Parker CJ; Solomon D
    BMC Med Educ; 2021 Apr; 21(1):200. PubMed ID: 33836741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the Predictors of Post-Clerkship USMLE Step 1 Scores.
    Torre DM; Dong T; Schreiber-Gregory D; Durning SJ; Pangaro L; Pock A; Hemmer PA
    Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(3):330-336. PubMed ID: 32075437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How curricular changes influence medical students' perceptions of basic science: A pilot study.
    Elfanagely Y; Tanzer JR; Pulido R; Rashid H; Copeland L
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236365. PubMed ID: 32697806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge using results from previous examinations.
    Guiot HM; Franqui-Rivera H
    Adv Med Educ Pract; 2018; 9():943-949. PubMed ID: 30588149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is There a Correlation Between Comprehensive Basic Science Examination and United States Medical Licensure Examination Step 1 Performance Among Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residents?
    Fagin AP; Engelstad ME; Markiewicz MR; Miloro M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jul; 78(7):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 32151653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Basic Science Knowledge Between DO and MD Students.
    Davis GE; Gayer GG
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2017 Feb; 117(2):114-123. PubMed ID: 28134953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Institutional Review: Which Metrics Correlate With a Successful United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Score?
    Shepard WD; Louis PJ; Powell KK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Feb; 78(2):179-183. PubMed ID: 31629759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and Evaluation of a Student-Initiated Test Preparation Program for the USMLE Step 1 Examination.
    Schwartz LF; Lineberry M; Park YS; Kamin CS; Hyderi AA
    Teach Learn Med; 2018; 30(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 29240455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of three commercial coaching courses on Step One USMLE performance.
    Werner LS; Bull BS
    Med Educ; 2003 Jun; 37(6):527-31. PubMed ID: 12787375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.