These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35073887)

  • 1. Modernising grip dynamometry: Inter-instrument reliability between GripAble and Jamar.
    Mutalib SA; Mace M; Seager C; Burdet E; Mathiowetz V; Goldsmith N
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 23(1):80. PubMed ID: 35073887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GripAble: Interrater reliability and normative grip strength of UK population.
    Mutalib SA; Sharma D; Pike S; Gwynne L; Hyde S; Morehouse J; Davey H; Edwards L; Douglass-Kirk P; Burdet E; Goldsmith N; Mace M
    J Hand Ther; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38521687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GripAble: An accurate, sensitive and robust digital device for measuring grip strength.
    Mace M; Mutalib SA; Ogrinc M; Goldsmith N; Burdet E
    J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng; 2022; 9():20556683221078455. PubMed ID: 35251685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interrater Reliability and Precision of a Novel Hand Strength Assessment and Treatment Device: The GripAble.
    Ergen HI; Kudin R; McGee CW
    Am J Occup Ther; 2024 Sep; 78(5):. PubMed ID: 39074241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of Reliability and Validity of the Load Cell-Type Hand Dynamometer Compared to the Jamar Dynamometer and the Number of Reliable Grip Strength Measurements.
    Kanauchi Y; Murase T; Nishiwaki M; Odagiri M; Wanezaki Y; Ishikawa H
    J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2023 Oct; 28(5):562-572. PubMed ID: 37881817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interinstrument Reliability Between the Squegg® Smart Dynamometer and Hand Grip Trainer and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer: A Pilot Study.
    Stamate A; Bertolaccini J; Deriaz M; Gunjan S; Marzan MD; Spiru L
    Am J Occup Ther; 2023 Sep; 77(5):. PubMed ID: 37824723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and Validity of the Martin Vigorimeter for Grip Strength Measurement in Korean Adults.
    Lee JK; Jung M; Lee HB; Chung HJ; Lee SH
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2024 Aug; 16(4):610-619. PubMed ID: 39092298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring grip strength in older adults: comparing the grip-ball with the Jamar dynamometer.
    Vermeulen J; Neyens JC; Spreeuwenberg MD; van Rossum E; Hewson DJ; de Witte LP
    J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2015; 38(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 25594521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and validity of two hand dynamometers when used by community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years.
    Huang L; Liu Y; Lin T; Hou L; Song Q; Ge N; Yue J
    BMC Geriatr; 2022 Jul; 22(1):580. PubMed ID: 35840905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity, reliability and test-retest study of Grip strength measurement in two positions with two dynamometers: Jamar® Plus and K-Force® Grip.
    Cildan Uysal S; Tonak HA; Kitis A
    Hand Surg Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 41(3):305-310. PubMed ID: 35283336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength.
    Mathiowetz V
    Occup Ther Int; 2002; 9(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 12374997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of grip strength: validity and reliability of the sphygmomanometer and jamar grip dynamometer.
    Hamilton GF; McDonald C; Chenier TC
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1992; 16(5):215-9. PubMed ID: 18796752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validating the Capability for Measuring Age-Related Changes in Grip-Force Strength Using a Digital Hand-Held Dynamometer in Healthy Young and Elderly Adults.
    Lee SC; Wu LC; Chiang SL; Lu LH; Chen CY; Lin CH; Ni CH; Lin CH
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():6936879. PubMed ID: 32382565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Grip Strength Measurements by Widely Used Three Dynamometers in Outpatients Aged 60 Years and Over.
    Savas S; Kilavuz A; Kayhan Koçak FÖ; Cavdar S
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jun; 12(13):. PubMed ID: 37445293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of the Dexter Evaluation System's Jamar dynamometer attachment for assessment of hand grip strength in a normal population.
    Bellace JV; Healy D; Besser MP; Byron T; Hohman L
    J Hand Ther; 2000; 13(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10718222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring handgrip strength in school children: inter-instrument reliability between Takei and Jamar.
    Trajković N; Rančić D; Ilić T; Herodek R; Korobeynikov G; Pekas D
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1074. PubMed ID: 38212414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the strength endurance parameters for the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment (BTE) Simulator II and the Jamar Handgrip Dynamometer.
    Myers E; Triscari R
    Work; 2017; 57(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 28506016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grip force monitoring on the hand: Manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer.
    Mühldorfer-Fodor M; Ziegler S; Harms C; Neumann J; Cristalli A; Kalpen A; Kundt G; Mittlmeier T; Prommersberger KJ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(8):1179-88. PubMed ID: 24935661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge.
    King TI
    Am J Occup Ther; 2013; 67(4):480-3. PubMed ID: 23791323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices.
    Lupton-Smith A; Fourie K; Mazinyo A; Mokone M; Nxaba S; Morrow B
    S Afr J Physiother; 2022; 78(1):1768. PubMed ID: 36262213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.