These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35074619)

  • 1. Clarifying the relationship between coherence and accuracy in probability judgments.
    Zhu JQ; Newall PWS; Sundh J; Chater N; Sanborn AN
    Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():105022. PubMed ID: 35074619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments.
    Zhu JQ; Sanborn AN; Chater N
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Oct; 127(5):719-748. PubMed ID: 32191073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():106-33. PubMed ID: 27570097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impaired probability estimation and decision-making in pathological gambling poker players.
    Linnet J; Frøslev M; Ramsgaard S; Gebauer L; Mouridsen K; Wohlert V
    J Gambl Stud; 2012 Mar; 28(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 21484601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Instruction in information structuring improves Bayesian judgment in intelligence analysts.
    Mandel DR
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():387. PubMed ID: 25904882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Information Formats and Incidental Affect on Prior and Posterior Probability Judgments.
    Armstrong BA; Sparrow EP; Spaniol J
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Jul; 40(5):680-692. PubMed ID: 32659157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The similarity-updating model of probability judgment and belief revision.
    Albrecht R; Jenny MA; Nilsson H; Rieskamp J
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Nov; 128(6):1088-1111. PubMed ID: 34292023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heuristics can produce surprisingly rational probability estimates: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 26709414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychopathology of Online Poker Players: Review of Literature.
    Moreau A; Chabrol H; Chauchard E
    J Behav Addict; 2016 Jun; 5(2):155-68. PubMed ID: 27348559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probability theory plus noise: Replies to Crupi and Tentori (2016) and to Nilsson, Juslin, and Winman (2016).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):112-23. PubMed ID: 26709415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing Analytical Reasoning in the Intensive Care Unit.
    Barash M; Nanchal RS
    Crit Care Clin; 2022 Jan; 38(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 34794631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving Probability Judgment in Intelligence Analysis: From Structured Analysis to Statistical Aggregation.
    Karvetski CW; Mandel DR; Irwin D
    Risk Anal; 2020 May; 40(5):1040-1057. PubMed ID: 32065440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cue-Reactive Rationality, Visual Imagery and Volitional Control Predict Cue-Reactive Urge to Gamble in Poker-Machine Gamblers.
    Clark GI; Rock AJ; McKeith CFA; Coventry WL
    J Gambl Stud; 2017 Sep; 33(3):807-823. PubMed ID: 27804002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How experimental methods shaped views on human competence and rationality.
    Lejarraga T; Hertwig R
    Psychol Bull; 2021 Jun; 147(6):535-564. PubMed ID: 34843298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asking better questions: How presentation formats influence information search.
    Wu CM; Meder B; Filimon F; Nelson JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1274-1297. PubMed ID: 28318286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are poker players all the same? Latent class analysis.
    Dufour M; Brunelle N; Roy É
    J Gambl Stud; 2015 Jun; 31(2):441-54. PubMed ID: 24317705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive distortions, anxiety, and depression among regular and pathological gambling online poker players.
    Barrault S; Varescon I
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 Mar; 16(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 23363229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's quantitative Bayesian inferences from natural frequencies and number of chances.
    Pighin S; Girotto V; Tentori K
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():164-175. PubMed ID: 28692831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.