BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35074626)

  • 1. Random vector functional link with ε-insensitive Huber loss function for biomedical data classification.
    Hazarika BB; Gupta D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Mar; 215():106622. PubMed ID: 35074626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On Regularization Based Twin Support Vector Regression with Huber Loss.
    Gupta U; Gupta D
    Neural Process Lett; 2021; 53(1):459-515. PubMed ID: 33424418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Improved Ensemble of Random Vector Functional Link Networks Based on Particle Swarm Optimization with Double Optimization Strategy.
    Ling QH; Song YQ; Han F; Yang D; Huang DS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165803. PubMed ID: 27835638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Symmetric LINEX loss twin support vector machine for robust classification and its fast iterative algorithm.
    Si Q; Yang Z; Ye J
    Neural Netw; 2023 Nov; 168():143-160. PubMed ID: 37748393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An unsupervised parameter learning model for RVFL neural network.
    Zhang Y; Wu J; Cai Z; Du B; Yu PS
    Neural Netw; 2019 Apr; 112():85-97. PubMed ID: 30771727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical study of seven data mining algorithms on different characteristics of datasets for biomedical classification applications.
    Zhang Y; Xin Y; Li Q; Ma J; Li S; Lv X; Lv W
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Nov; 16(1):125. PubMed ID: 29096638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Universum based Lagrangian twin bounded support vector machine to classify EEG signals.
    Kumar B; Gupta D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106244. PubMed ID: 34216880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MLapRVFL: Protein sequence prediction based on Multi-Laplacian Regularized Random Vector Functional Link.
    Gu X; Ding Y; Xiao P
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Dec; 167():107618. PubMed ID: 37925912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel ramp loss-based multi-task twin support vector machine with multi-parameter safe acceleration.
    Pang X; Zhao J; Xu Y
    Neural Netw; 2022 Jun; 150():194-212. PubMed ID: 35316737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inverse free reduced universum twin support vector machine for imbalanced data classification.
    Moosaei H; Ganaie MA; Hladík M; Tanveer M
    Neural Netw; 2023 Jan; 157():125-135. PubMed ID: 36334534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Label Noise on the Learning Based Models for a Binary Classification of Physiological Signal.
    Ding C; Pereira T; Xiao R; Lee RJ; Hu X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new learning paradigm for random vector functional-link network: RVFL.
    Zhang PB; Yang ZX
    Neural Netw; 2020 Feb; 122():94-105. PubMed ID: 31677442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MLSeq: Machine learning interface for RNA-sequencing data.
    Goksuluk D; Zararsiz G; Korkmaz S; Eldem V; Zararsiz GE; Ozcetin E; Ozturk A; Karaagaoglu AE
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 175():223-231. PubMed ID: 31104710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Capped Linex Metric Twin Support Vector Machine for Robust Classification.
    Wang Y; Yu G; Ma J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 36081040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonparallel support vector regression model and its SMO-type solver.
    Tang L; Tian Y; Yang C
    Neural Netw; 2018 Sep; 105():431-446. PubMed ID: 29945062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sparse solution of least-squares twin multi-class support vector machine using ℓ
    Moosaei H; Hladík M
    Neural Netw; 2023 Sep; 166():471-486. PubMed ID: 37574621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
    Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of fast curvelet Tsallis entropy and kernel random vector functional link network for automated detection of multiclass brain abnormalities.
    Nayak DR; Dash R; Majhi B; Acharya UR
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2019 Oct; 77():101656. PubMed ID: 31563069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Machine Learning Models for the Hearing Impairment Prediction in Workers Exposed to Complex Industrial Noise: A Pilot Study.
    Zhao Y; Li J; Zhang M; Lu Y; Xie H; Tian Y; Qiu W
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):690-699. PubMed ID: 30142102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MRI-Based Brain Tumor Classification Using Ensemble of Deep Features and Machine Learning Classifiers.
    Kang J; Ullah Z; Gwak J
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(6):. PubMed ID: 33810176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.