These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35075091)

  • 1. Wearable Exoskeletons on the Workplaces: Knowledge, Attitudes and Perspectives of Health and Safety Managers on the implementation of exoskeleton technology in Northern Italy.
    Riccò M; Ranzieri S; Vezzosi L; Balzarini F; Bragazzi NL
    Acta Biomed; 2022 Jan; 92(6):e2021310. PubMed ID: 35075091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology.
    Wolff J; Parker C; Borisoff J; Mortenson WB; Mattie J
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Dec; 11():169. PubMed ID: 25523497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A survey of stakeholder perspectives on a proposed combined exoskeleton-wheelchair technology.
    Bhatnagar T; Ben Mortensen W; Mattie J; Wolff J; Parker C; Borisoff J
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1574-1579. PubMed ID: 28814044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Manufacturing Industry Stakeholder Perspectives on Occupational Exoskeletons: Changes after a Brief Exposure to Exoskeletons.
    Raghuraman RN; Upasani S; Gonzales A; Aviles J; Cha J; Srinivasan D
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2023; 11(3-4):71-80. PubMed ID: 37747446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Industrial exoskeletons: Need for intervention effectiveness research.
    Howard J; Murashov VV; Lowe BD; Lu ML
    Am J Ind Med; 2020 Mar; 63(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 31828844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supporting Surgical Teams: Identifying Needs and Barriers for Exoskeleton Implementation in the Operating Room.
    Cha JS; Monfared S; Stefanidis D; Nussbaum MA; Yu D
    Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):377-390. PubMed ID: 31593495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physiotherapy students' perspectives on the use and implementation of exoskeletons as a rehabilitative technology in clinical settings.
    Zabel S; Lockhart Z; Badiani N; Cornish J; Falzon L; Flis A; Patterson K; Gregor S; Vaughan-Graham J
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Oct; 17(7):840-847. PubMed ID: 32928001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perspectives of End Users on the Potential Use of Trunk Exoskeletons for People With Low-Back Pain: A Focus Group Study.
    Baltrusch SJ; Houdijk H; van Dieën JH; van Bennekom CAM; de Kruif AJTCM
    Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):365-376. PubMed ID: 31914327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying Facilitators, Barriers, and Potential Solutions of Adopting Exoskeletons and Exosuits in Construction Workplaces.
    Mahmud D; Bennett ST; Zhu Z; Adamczyk PG; Wehner M; Veeramani D; Dai F
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. WHAT ARE USER PERSPECTIVES OF EXOSKELETON TECHNOLOGY? A LITERATURE REVIEW.
    Hill D; Holloway CS; Morgado Ramirez DZ; Smitham P; Pappas Y
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(2):160-167. PubMed ID: 28849760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social Processes: What Determines Industrial Workers' Intention to Use Exoskeletons?
    Elprama SA; Vannieuwenhuyze JTA; De Bock S; Vanderborght B; De Pauw K; Meeusen R; Jacobs A
    Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):337-350. PubMed ID: 31971838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton for Manual Materials Handling: Reduction of Low Back Loading and Metabolic Effort during Repetitive Lifting.
    Schmalz T; Colienne A; Bywater E; Fritzsche L; Gärtner C; Bellmann M; Reimer S; Ernst M
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2022; 10(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 34763618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An industrial exoskeleton user acceptance framework based on a literature review of empirical studies.
    Elprama SA; Vanderborght B; Jacobs A
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Apr; 100():103615. PubMed ID: 34847372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical and Cognitive Load Effects Due to a Powered Lower-Body Exoskeleton.
    Bequette B; Norton A; Jones E; Stirling L
    Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):411-423. PubMed ID: 32202434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting.
    Zhou X; Zheng L
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2021; 9(3-4):167-185. PubMed ID: 34254566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of exoskeletons in the occupational context for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of work-related musculoskeletal complaints.
    Steinhilber B; Luger T; Schwenkreis P; Middeldorf S; Bork H; Mann B; von Glinski A; Schildhauer TA; Weiler S; Schmauder M; Heinrich K; Winter G; Schnalke G; Frener P; Schick R; Wischniewski S; Jäger M
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2020; 8(3):132-144. PubMed ID: 33140996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk perception of heat related disorders on the workplaces: a survey among health and safety representatives from the autonomous province of Trento, Northeastern Italy.
    RICCò M; Razio B; Poletti L; Panato C; Balzarini F; Mezzoiuso AG; Vezzosi L
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2020 Mar; 61(1):E48-E59. PubMed ID: 32490269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exoskeleton use in post-stroke gait rehabilitation: a qualitative study of the perspectives of persons post-stroke and physiotherapists.
    Vaughan-Graham J; Brooks D; Rose L; Nejat G; Pons J; Patterson K
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Sep; 17(1):123. PubMed ID: 32912215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exoscore: A Design Tool to Evaluate Factors Associated With Technology Acceptance of Soft Lower Limb Exosuits by Older Adults.
    Shore L; Power V; Hartigan B; Schülein S; Graf E; de Eyto A; O'Sullivan L
    Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):391-410. PubMed ID: 31419179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinician Perceptions of Robotic Exoskeletons for Locomotor Training After Spinal Cord Injury: A Qualitative Approach.
    Ehrlich-Jones L; Crown DS; Kinnett-Hopkins D; Field-Fote E; Furbish C; Mummidisetty CK; Bond RA; Forrest G; Jayaraman A; Heinemann AW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Feb; 102(2):203-215. PubMed ID: 33171130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.