These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35075835)

  • 1. [PM
    Wang ZY; Li YB; Guo L; Song ZQ; Xu YL; Wang F; Liang WQ; Shi GL; Feng YC
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2022 Feb; 43(2):608-618. PubMed ID: 35075835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Source insights into the 11-h daytime and nighttime fine ambient particulate matter in China as well as the synthetic studies using the new Multilinear Engine 2-species ratios (ME2-SR) method.
    Shi G; Chen G; Liu G; Wang H; Tian Y; Feng Y
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Oct; 181():304-311. PubMed ID: 27376869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physically constrained source apportionment (PCSA) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon using the Multilinear Engine 2-species ratios (ME2-SR) method.
    Liu GR; Shi GL; Tian YZ; Wang YN; Zhang CY; Feng YC
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Jan; 502():16-21. PubMed ID: 25240101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Source apportionment for fine particulate matter in a Chinese city using an improved gas-constrained method and comparison with multiple receptor models.
    Shi G; Liu J; Wang H; Tian Y; Wen J; Shi X; Feng Y; Ivey CE; Russell AG
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Feb; 233():1058-1067. PubMed ID: 29033173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization and source apportionment of PM
    Liu B; Wu J; Zhang J; Wang L; Yang J; Liang D; Dai Q; Bi X; Feng Y; Zhang Y; Zhang Q
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Mar; 222():10-22. PubMed ID: 28088626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of Three Receptor Models for Source Apportionment of PM
    Zhou M
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2020 May; 41(5):1997-2005. PubMed ID: 32608816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Source apportionment of PM
    Park J; Kim H; Kim Y; Heo J; Kim SW; Jeon K; Yi SM; Hopke PK
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 833():155056. PubMed ID: 35395292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oxidative potential of ambient PM
    Liu W; Xu Y; Liu W; Liu Q; Yu S; Liu Y; Wang X; Tao S
    Environ Pollut; 2018 May; 236():514-528. PubMed ID: 29428706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PM
    Li W; Qi Y; Qu W; Qu W; Shi J; Zhang D; Liu Y; Zhang Y; Zhang W; Ren D; Ma Y; Wang X; Yi L; Sheng L; Zhou Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Feb; 858(Pt 2):159948. PubMed ID: 36336053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Source apportionment and toxicity assessment of PM
    Wang S; Ji Y; Zhao J; Lin Y; Lin Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 713():136428. PubMed ID: 32019009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular and elemental marker-based source apportionment of fine particulate matter at six sites in Hong Kong, China.
    Chow WS; Huang XHH; Leung KF; Huang L; Wu X; Yu JZ
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 813():152652. PubMed ID: 34954166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hybrid source apportionment strategy using positive matrix factorization (PMF) and molecular marker chemical mass balance (MM-CMB) models.
    Lu Z; Liu Q; Xiong Y; Huang F; Zhou J; Schauer JJ
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul; 238():39-51. PubMed ID: 29533882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of PM2.5 source apportionment using positive matrix factorization and molecular marker-based chemical mass balance.
    Ke L; Liu W; Wang Y; Russell AG; Edgerton ES; Zheng M
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 May; 394(2-3):290-302. PubMed ID: 18313727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Source Apportionment of PM2.5 in Delhi, India Using PMF Model.
    Sharma SK; Mandal TK; Jain S; Saraswati ; Sharma A; Saxena M
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2016 Aug; 97(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 27209541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Real-time Source Apportionment of PM
    Jiang SN; Kong SF; Zheng H; Zeng X; Chen N; Qi SH
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2022 Jan; 43(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 34989490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chemical characteristics and source apportionment of PM
    Li Y; Liu B; Xue Z; Zhang Y; Sun X; Song C; Dai Q; Fu R; Tai Y; Gao J; Zheng Y; Feng Y
    Environ Pollut; 2020 Aug; 263(Pt B):114532. PubMed ID: 32311623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal-spatial characteristics and source apportionment of PM
    Gao J; Wang K; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhu C; Hao J; Liu H; Hua S; Tian H
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Feb; 233():714-724. PubMed ID: 29126093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Source Apportionment of Total Suspended Particles (TSP) by Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) and Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Modeling in Ahvaz, Iran.
    Ashrafi K; Fallah R; Hadei M; Yarahmadi M; Shahsavani A
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2018 Aug; 75(2):278-294. PubMed ID: 29313074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Six sources mainly contributing to the haze episodes and health risk assessment of PM
    Xu X; Zhang H; Chen J; Li Q; Wang X; Wang W; Zhang Q; Xue L; Ding A; Mellouki A
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Dec; 166():146-156. PubMed ID: 30265878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing using principal component analysis/absolute principal component scores and UNMIX.
    Song Y; Xie S; Zhang Y; Zeng L; Salmon LG; Zheng M
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Dec; 372(1):278-86. PubMed ID: 17097135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.