These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35077368)

  • 1. A Comparison of Vibrotactile Feedback and Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) for Motor Response During Active Hand Movement.
    Korres G; Park W; Eid M
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2022; 15(1):74-78. PubMed ID: 35077368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multimodal Haptic Feedback for Virtual Collisions Combining Vibrotactile and Electrical Muscle Stimulation.
    Lee J; Choi S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2024; 17(1):33-38. PubMed ID: 38227400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeated training with augmentative vibrotactile feedback increases object manipulation performance.
    Stepp CE; An Q; Matsuoka Y
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e32743. PubMed ID: 22384283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative to direct haptic feedback, remote vibrotactile feedback improves but slows object manipulation.
    Stepp CE; Matsuoka Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2089-92. PubMed ID: 21095683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback.
    Stepp CE; Matsuoka Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Dec; 19(6):677-85. PubMed ID: 21984521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supplemental vibrotactile feedback control of stabilization and reaching actions of the arm using limb state and position error encodings.
    Krueger AR; Giannoni P; Shah V; Casadio M; Scheidt RA
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 May; 14(1):36. PubMed ID: 28464891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the effects of adding vibrotactile feedback to myoelectric prosthesis users on performance and visual attention in a dual-task paradigm.
    Raveh E; Friedman J; Portnoy S
    Clin Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 29756458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FaceGuard: A Wearable System To Avoid Face Touching.
    Michelin AM; Korres G; Ba'ara S; Assadi H; Alsuradi H; Sayegh RR; Argyros A; Eid M
    Front Robot AI; 2021; 8():612392. PubMed ID: 33898529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adding vibrotactile feedback to a myoelectric-controlled hand improves performance when online visual feedback is disturbed.
    Raveh E; Portnoy S; Friedman J
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Apr; 58():32-40. PubMed ID: 29353091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vibrotactile sensory substitution for object manipulation: amplitude versus pulse train frequency modulation.
    Stepp CE; Matsuoka Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 Jan; 20(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 21997322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vibro- and electrotactile user feedback on hand opening for myoelectric forearm prostheses.
    Witteveen HJ; Droog EA; Rietman JS; Veltink PH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Aug; 59(8):2219-26. PubMed ID: 22645262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visuomotor behaviors and performance in a dual-task paradigm with and without vibrotactile feedback when using a myoelectric controlled hand.
    Raveh E; Friedman J; Portnoy S
    Assist Technol; 2018; 30(5):274-280. PubMed ID: 28628379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Augmenting sensorimotor control using "goal-aware" vibrotactile stimulation during reaching and manipulation behaviors.
    Tzorakoleftherakis E; Murphey TD; Scheidt RA
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 234(8):2403-14. PubMed ID: 27074942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis.
    Thomas N; Ung G; McGarvey C; Brown JD
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 16(1):70. PubMed ID: 31186005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Supplemental vibrotactile feedback of real-time limb position enhances precision of goal-directed reaching.
    Risi N; Shah V; Mrotek LA; Casadio M; Scheidt RA
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Jul; 122(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 30995149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-time vibrotactile pattern generation and identification using discrete event-driven feedback.
    Erbaş İ; Güçlü B
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2024 Jun; 41(2):77-89. PubMed ID: 36751096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vibrotactile display coding for a balance prosthesis.
    Kadkade PP; Benda BJ; Schmidt PB; Wall C
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Dec; 11(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 14960115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of vibrotactile feedback on human learning of arm motions.
    Bark K; Hyman E; Tan F; Cha E; Jax SA; Buxbaum LJ; Kuchenbecker KJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015 Jan; 23(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 25486644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft Wearable Skin-Stretch Device for Haptic Feedback Using Twisted and Coiled Polymer Actuators.
    Chossat JB; Chen DKY; Park YL; Shull PB
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2019; 12(4):521-532. PubMed ID: 31562105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing vibrotactile feedback strategies by controlling a cursor with unstable dynamics.
    Quick KM; Card NS; Whaite SM; Mischel J; Loughlin P; Batista AP
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():2589-92. PubMed ID: 25570520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.