255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35078009)
1. Regional trends of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer and exploration of perioperative outcomes.
Holtzman S; Chaoul J; Finkelstein M; Kolev V; Zakashansky K
Cancer Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 77():102095. PubMed ID: 35078009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period.
Matsuo K; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Chang EJ; Klar M; Matsushima K; Grubbs BH; Roman LD; Wright JD
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 32473728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.
Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D;
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach.
Brandt B; Levin G; Leitao MM
Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2022 Jan; 23(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 35167007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rates over time and regional variation of radical minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: A population based study.
Willows K; Kupets R; Diong C; Vicus D; Covens A; Gien LT
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):338-344. PubMed ID: 31171407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.
Kim SI; Kim TH; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Lee TS; Jeon HW; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Yonsei Med J; 2021 Mar; 62(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 33635013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy (mLPS-RH) vs laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy (LESS-RH) in early stage cervical cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Fagotti A; Ghezzi F; Boruta DM; Scambia G; Escobar P; Fader AN; Malzoni M; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1005-9. PubMed ID: 24768978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends and comparative effectiveness of inpatient radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States (2012-2015).
Uppal S; Rebecca Liu J; Kevin Reynolds R; Rice LW; Spencer RJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 152(1):133-138. PubMed ID: 30424895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Smith AJB; Jones TN; Miao D; Fader AN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):544-555.e7. PubMed ID: 33359291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: A two-center retrospective cohort study with pathologic review of usual-type adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma.
Kim Y; Kim SI; Kim H; Lee M; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Lee C; Suh DH
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 167(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 35970602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan.
Ohta T; Nagase S; Okui Y; Enomoto T; Yamagami W; Mikami M; Tokunaga H; Ino K; Ushijima K; Shozu M; Tashiro H; Mandai M; Miyamoto S; Morishige KI; Yoshida Y; Yoshino K; Saito T; Kobayashi E; Kobayashi H; Takekuma M; Terai Y; Fujii T; Kanao H; Aoki D; Katabuchi H; Yaegashi N
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Dec; 26(12):2318-2330. PubMed ID: 34435284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Management in the US: A National Cancer Database Analysis.
Wolf J; Wu Y; Hayek J; Zhang Q; Alagkiozidis I
Curr Oncol; 2024 May; 31(5):2836-2845. PubMed ID: 38785496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.
Gil-Moreno A; Carbonell-Socias M; Salicrú S; Centeno-Mediavilla C; Franco-Camps S; Colas E; Oaknin A; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29908339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
