These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35078060)

  • 1. Socio-psychological factors influencing intent to adopt conservation practices in the Minnesota River Basin.
    Lang Z; Rabotyagov S
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 307():114466. PubMed ID: 35078060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting Farmer Adoption of Water Conservation Practices Using a Norm-based Moral Obligation Model.
    Pradhananga AK; Davenport MA
    Environ Manage; 2019 Oct; 64(4):483-496. PubMed ID: 31392395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thinking Upstream: How Do Landowner Attitudes Affect Forested Riparian Buffer Coverage?
    Armstrong A; Stedman RC
    Environ Manage; 2020 May; 65(5):689-701. PubMed ID: 32086548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social-psychological determinants of farmer intention to adopt nutrient best management practices: Implications for resilient adaptation to climate change.
    Doran EMB; Zia A; Hurley SE; Tsai Y; Koliba C; Adair C; Schattman RE; Rizzo DM; Méndez VE
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Dec; 276():111304. PubMed ID: 32906074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The lay of the land: What we know about non-operating agricultural and absentee forest landowners in the U.S. and Europe.
    Fairchild E; Ulrich-Schad JD; Petrzelka P; Ma Z
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 313():114991. PubMed ID: 35367676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Landowners' incentives for constructing wetlands in an agricultural area in south Sweden.
    Hansson A; Pedersen E; Weisner SE
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 113():271-8. PubMed ID: 23064246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.
    Balukas JA; Bell KP; Bauer DM
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():751-758. PubMed ID: 30529417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach.
    Putten vI; Jennings SM; Louviere JJ; Burgess LB
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2647-56. PubMed ID: 21719189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changing landowners, changing ecosystem? Land-ownership motivations as drivers of land management practices.
    Sorice MG; Kreuter UP; Wilcox BP; Fox WE
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 133():144-52. PubMed ID: 24374464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Landowners' Socio-Cultural Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Trees in Costa Rican Agricultural Landscapes.
    Leary J; Grimm K; Aslan C; Mark M; Frey S; Bath-Rosenfeld R
    Environ Manage; 2021 May; 67(5):974-987. PubMed ID: 33661346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Larkin JL
    Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 63(2):270-281. PubMed ID: 30535797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the ecological conservation behavior of farmers in payment for ecosystem service programs in eco-environmentally fragile areas using social psychology models.
    Deng J; Sun P; Zhao F; Han X; Yang G; Feng Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Apr; 550():382-390. PubMed ID: 26829672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Landowner preferences for wetlands conservation programs in two Southern Ontario watersheds.
    Trenholm R; Haider W; Lantz V; Knowler D; Haegeli P
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Sep; 200():6-21. PubMed ID: 28549304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing farmers' intention towards conservation agriculture by using the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior.
    Tama RAZ; Ying L; Yu M; Hoque MM; Adnan KM; Sarker SA
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 280():111654. PubMed ID: 33221044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A framework for engaging stakeholders in water quality modeling and management: Application to the Qu'Appelle River Basin, Canada.
    Hassanzadeh E; Strickert G; Morales-Marin L; Noble B; Baulch H; Shupena-Soulodre E; Lindenschmidt KE
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 231():1117-1126. PubMed ID: 30602236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of adaptive management for watershed councils.
    Habron G
    Environ Manage; 2003 Jan; 31(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 12447573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Landowner Satisfaction with the Wetland Reserve Program in Texas: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.
    Stroman D; Kreuter UP
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 57(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 26289350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A meta-analysis of agricultural conservation intentions, behaviors, and practices: Insights from 35 years of quantitative literature in the United States.
    Lu J; Ranjan P; Floress K; Arbuckle JG; Church SP; Eanes FR; Gao Y; Gramig BM; Singh AS; Prokopy LS
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Dec; 323():116240. PubMed ID: 36261983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A generic approach to evaluate costs and effectiveness of agricultural Beneficial Management Practices to improve water quality management.
    Zammali MK; Hassanzadeh E; Shupena-Soulodre E; Lindenschmidt KE
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 287():112336. PubMed ID: 33740750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.