These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35080025)

  • 21. Reporting and methodological quality of acupuncture network meta-analyses could be improved: an evidence mapping.
    Wang Y; Chen N; Guo K; Li Y; E F; Yang C; Shang X; Li X; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jan; 153():1-12. PubMed ID: 36351510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Knowledge user survey and Delphi process to inform development of a new risk of bias tool to assess systematic reviews with network meta-analysis (RoB NMA tool).
    Lunny C; Veroniki AA; Hutton B; White I; Higgins J; Wright JM; Kim JY; Thirugnanasampanthar SS; Siddiqui S; Watt J; Moja L; Taske N; Lorenz RC; Gerrish S; Straus S; Minogue V; Hu F; Lin K; Kapani A; Nagi S; Chen L; Akbar-Nejad M; Tricco AC
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Feb; 28(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 35948412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews on exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional analysis using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool.
    Almeida MO; Yamato TP; Parreira PDCS; Costa LOP; Kamper S; Saragiotto BT
    Braz J Phys Ther; 2020; 24(2):103-117. PubMed ID: 31113734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review.
    Wang X; Welch V; Li M; Yao L; Littell J; Li H; Yang N; Wang J; Shamseer L; Chen Y; Yang K; Grimshaw JM
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 17(1):e1134. PubMed ID: 37133262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses assessing the effects of ankle-foot orthosis on clinical outcomes in stroke patients: A methodological systematic review.
    Shahabi S; Mojgani P; Lankarani KB; Jalali M
    Health Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e1130. PubMed ID: 36875933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors associated with the reporting quality of low back pain systematic review abstracts in physical therapy: a methodological study.
    Nascimento DP; Gonzalez GZ; Araujo AC; Moseley A; Maher C; Costa LOP
    Braz J Phys Ther; 2021; 25(3):233-241. PubMed ID: 33246869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Single nucleotide polymorphisms as a predisposing factor for the development of apical periodontitis-An umbrella review.
    Jakovljevic A; Jacimovic J; Georgiou AC; Nikolic N; Aminoshariae A; van der Waal SV; Nagendrababu V
    Int Endod J; 2022 Jul; 55(7):700-713. PubMed ID: 35476797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Kattan S; Lee SM; Kohli MR; Setzer FC; Karabucak B
    J Endod; 2018 Jan; 44(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 29032820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in dentistry including animal studies: a cross-sectional study.
    Menne MC; Su N; Faggion CM
    Ir Vet J; 2023 Dec; 76(1):33. PubMed ID: 38098065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews.
    Swierz MJ; Storman D; Zajac J; Koperny M; Weglarz P; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach A; Kaluzinska K; Bochenek-Cibor J; Johnston BC; Bala MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):261. PubMed ID: 34837960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meta-Review: Network Meta-Analyses in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
    Cortese S; Tomlinson A; Cipriani A
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2019 Feb; 58(2):167-179. PubMed ID: 30738544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Tsokani S; Zevgiti S; Pagkalidou I; Kontouli KM; Ambarcioglu P; Pandis N; Lunny C; Nikolakopoulou A; Papakonstantinou T; Chaimani A; Straus SE; Hutton B; Tricco AC; Mavridis D; Salanti G
    Syst Rev; 2021 Sep; 10(1):246. PubMed ID: 34507621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Node-making process in network meta-analysis of nonpharmacological treatment are poorly reported.
    James A; Yavchitz A; Ravaud P; Boutron I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():95-102. PubMed ID: 29196202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting.
    Pieper D; Koensgen N; Breuing J; Ge L; Wegewitz U
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):56. PubMed ID: 29914386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Methodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder.
    Ross A; Rankin J; Beaman J; Murray K; Sinnett P; Riddle R; Haskins J; Vassar M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0181927. PubMed ID: 28771633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predictors of Higher Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Nutrition and Cancer Prevention.
    Storman D; Koperny M; Zając J; Polak M; Weglarz P; Bochenek-Cibor J; Swierz MJ; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach AA; Kaluzinska K; Bała MM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric urology: can practices on contemporary highest levels of evidence be built?
    O'Kelly F; DeCotiis K; Aditya I; Braga LH; Koyle MA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Apr; 16(2):207-217. PubMed ID: 31917158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Statistical analyses and quality of individual participant data network meta-analyses were suboptimal: a cross-sectional study.
    Gao Y; Shi S; Li M; Luo X; Liu M; Yang K; Zhang J; Song F; Tian J
    BMC Med; 2020 Jun; 18(1):120. PubMed ID: 32475340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.