123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35081207)
1. Quality of automatic geocoding tools: a study using addresses from hospital record files in Temuco, Chile.
Quinteros ME; Blazquez C; Rosas F; Ayala S; García XMO; Delgado-Saborit JM; Harrison RM; Ruiz-Rudolph P; Yohannessen K
Cad Saude Publica; 2022; 38(1):e00288920. PubMed ID: 35081207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
Faure E; Danjou AM; Clavel-Chapelon F; Boutron-Ruault MC; Dossus L; Fervers B
Environ Health; 2017 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 28235407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Who Hits the Mark? A Comparative Study of the Free Geocoding Services of Google and OpenStreetMap].
Lemke D; Mattauch V; Heidinger O; Hense HW
Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Sep; 77(8-9):e160-5. PubMed ID: 26154258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving geocoding matching rates of structured addresses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cortes TR; Silveira IHD; Junger WL
Cad Saude Publica; 2021; 37(7):e00039321. PubMed ID: 34346979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Geocoding one million of addresses using API: a semiautomatic multistep procedure].
Mataloni F; Bauleo L; Badaloni C; Nobile F; Savastano J; Noccioli F; Salatino CG; Balducci M; Cappai G; Rosa AC; Asta F; Fusco D; Michelozzi P; Davoli M
Epidemiol Prev; 2022; 46(3):160-167. PubMed ID: 35443573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Use of Google Maps for geocoding data from the Mortality Information System in Rio de Janeiro municipality, Brazil, 2010-2012].
Silveira IHD; Oliveira BFA; Junger WL
Epidemiol Serv Saude; 2017; 26(4):881-886. PubMed ID: 29211150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Smartphone-assisted spatial data collection improves geographic information quality: pilot study using a birth records dataset.
Xu X; Hu H; Ha S; Han D
Geospat Health; 2016 Nov; 11(3):482. PubMed ID: 27903063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Impacts of geocoding quality in environmental epidemiology studies: two case-studies in Tuscany Region (Central Italy)].
Nuvolone D; Santini M; Pepe P; Cipriani F
Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 26951701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Match rate and positional accuracy of two geocoding methods for epidemiologic research.
Zhan FB; Brender JD; De Lima I; Suarez L; Langlois PH
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):842-9. PubMed ID: 17027286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods.
Duncan DT; Castro MC; Blossom JC; Bennett GG; Gortmaker SL
Geospat Health; 2011 May; 5(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 21590677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geocoding rural addresses in a community contaminated by PFOA: a comparison of methods.
Vieira VM; Howard GJ; Gallagher LG; Fletcher T
Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():18. PubMed ID: 20406495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positional accuracy of geocoding from residential postal codes versus full street addresses.
Khan S; Pinault L; Tjepkema M; Wilkins R
Health Rep; 2018 Feb; 29(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 29465738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing a single-stage geocoding method to a multi-stage geocoding method: how much and where do they disagree?
Lovasi GS; Weiss JC; Hoskins R; Whitsel EA; Rice K; Erickson CF; Psaty BM
Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 17367520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of Google and Yahoo applications for geocoding of postal addresses in epidemiological studies].
Quesada JA; Nolasco A; Moncho J
Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2013; 87(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 23775108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Geocoding processes in cohort studies: methods applied in the EpiFloripa Aging.
Salvador CC; Lopes AADS; Resendes D; Demarco FF; Justina MDD; Saboya RT; Rech CR; d'Orsi E
Rev Saude Publica; 2023; 57():88. PubMed ID: 37971072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Geocoding cryptosporidiosis cases in Ireland (2008-2017)-development of a reliable, reproducible, multiphase geocoding methodology.
Domegan L; Garvey P; McKeown P; Johnson H; Hynds P; O'Dwyer J; ÓhAiseadha C
Ir J Med Sci; 2021 Nov; 190(4):1497-1507. PubMed ID: 33464478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multifaceted comparison of ArcGIS and MapMarker for automated geocoding.
Kumar S; Liu M; Hwang SA
Geospat Health; 2012 Nov; 7(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 23242688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A research agenda: does geocoding positional error matter in health GIS studies?
Jacquez GM
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 22469487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved Geocoding of Cancer Registry Addresses in Urban and Rural Oklahoma.
Dilekli N; Janitz A; Campbell J
J Registry Manag; 2020; 47(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 32833379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses.
Cayo MR; Talbot TO
Int J Health Geogr; 2003 Dec; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 14687425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
