BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35081513)

  • 1. TMS intensity and focality correlation with coil orientation at three non-motor regions.
    Gomez-Feria J; Fernandez-Corazza M; Martin-Rodriguez JF; Mir P
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(5):. PubMed ID: 35081513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of non-brain anatomy and coil orientation on inter- and intra-subject variability in TMS at midline.
    Lee EG; Rastogi P; Hadimani RL; Jiles DC; Camprodon JA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Sep; 129(9):1873-1883. PubMed ID: 30005214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atlas of optimal coil orientation and position for TMS: A computational study.
    Gomez-Tames J; Hamasaka A; Laakso I; Hirata A; Ugawa Y
    Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(4):839-848. PubMed ID: 29699821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas.
    Janssen AM; Oostendorp TF; Stegeman DF
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 May; 12():47. PubMed ID: 25981522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.
    Gomez LJ; Goetz SM; Peterchev AV
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Aug; 15(4):046033. PubMed ID: 29855433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
    Opitz A; Legon W; Rowlands A; Bickel WK; Paulus W; Tyler WJ
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():253-264. PubMed ID: 23644000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Focality of the Induced E-Field Is a Contributing Factor in the Choice of TMS Parameters: Evidence from a 3D Computational Model of the Human Brain.
    Konakanchi D; de Jongh Curry AL; Waters RS; Narayana S
    Brain Sci; 2020 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 33353125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.
    Deng ZD; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Jan; 6(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 22483681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A 3-axis coil design for multichannel TMS arrays.
    Navarro de Lara LI; Daneshzand M; Mascarenas A; Paulson D; Pratt K; Okada Y; Raij T; Makarov SN; Nummenmaa A
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 224():117355. PubMed ID: 32916290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Database of 25 validated coil models for electric field simulations for TMS.
    Drakaki M; Mathiesen C; Siebner HR; Madsen K; Thielscher A
    Brain Stimul; 2022; 15(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 35490970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fast computational optimization of TMS coil placement for individualized electric field targeting.
    Gomez LJ; Dannhauer M; Peterchev AV
    Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117696. PubMed ID: 33385544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subject-Specific Multiscale Modeling to Investigate Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Goodwin BD; Butson CR
    Neuromodulation; 2015 Dec; 18(8):694-704. PubMed ID: 25953411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-time computation of the TMS-induced electric field in a realistic head model.
    Stenroos M; Koponen LM
    Neuroimage; 2019 Dec; 203():116159. PubMed ID: 31494248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detailed measurements and simulations of electric field distribution of two TMS coils cleared for obsessive compulsive disorder in the brain and in specific regions associated with OCD.
    Tzirini M; Roth Y; Harmelech T; Zibman S; Pell GS; Kimiskidis VK; Tendler A; Zangen A; Samaras T
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0263145. PubMed ID: 36040972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational and experimental analysis of TMS-induced electric field vectors critical to neuronal activation.
    Krieg TD; Salinas FS; Narayana S; Fox PT; Mogul DJ
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Aug; 12(4):046014. PubMed ID: 26052136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of coil orientation on the electric field induced by TMS over the hand motor area.
    Laakso I; Hirata A; Ugawa Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 59(1):203-18. PubMed ID: 24334481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trade-off between stimulation focality and the number of coils in multi-locus transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Nurmi S; Karttunen J; Souza VH; Ilmoniemi RJ; Nieminen JO
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Nov; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 34673563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimum-energy coils for transcranial magnetic stimulation: application to focal stimulation.
    Koponen LM; Nieminen JO; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 25458713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation method for in situ electric field in standardized human brain for different transcranial magnetic stimulation coils.
    Iwahashi M; Gomez-Tames J; Laakso I; Hirata A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2224-2238. PubMed ID: 28222046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Where does TMS Stimulate the Motor Cortex? Combining Electrophysiological Measurements and Realistic Field Estimates to Reveal the Affected Cortex Position.
    Bungert A; Antunes A; Espenhahn S; Thielscher A
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Nov; 27(11):5083-5094. PubMed ID: 27664963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.