These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35081719)
1. COMPARISON OF OPTICAL BIOMETERS ARGOS AND IOL MASTER 700. Románek J; Sluková K Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2021; 77(6):295-299. PubMed ID: 35081719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Selected Biometric Parameters in Cataract Patients-A Comparison between Argos Porwolik M; Porwolik A; Mrukwa-Kominek E Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Jun; 60(7):. PubMed ID: 39064485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients. Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer. Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):437-442. PubMed ID: 27834962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer. Yang CM; Lim DH; Kim HJ; Chung TY PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223114. PubMed ID: 31603903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry. Hoffer KJ; Hoffmann PC; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability and agreement of swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry biometers in myopes. Garcia Ardoy E; Mateos N; Roda L; Torrado Sierra O; Baptista AM; Serra PM Clin Exp Optom; 2023 Sep; 106(7):783-792. PubMed ID: 36508569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Ocular Biometry and Refractive Outcomes Using IOL Master 500, IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS900. Song JS; Yoon DY; Hyon JY; Jeon HS Korean J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 34(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 32233146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two new integrated SS-OCT tomography and biometry devices. Sorkin N; Achiron A; Abumanhal M; Abulafia A; Cohen E; Gutfreund S; Mandelblum J; Varssano D; Levinger E J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1277-1284. PubMed ID: 35608316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry. Huang J; Chen H; Li Y; Chen Z; Gao R; Yu J; Zhao Y; Lu W; McAlinden C; Wang Q J Refract Surg; 2019 Feb; 35(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 30742226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Analysis of Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Partial Coherence Interferometry Biometers in the Prediction of Cataract Surgery Refractive Outcomes. Cummings AB; Naughton S; Coen AM; Brennan E; Kelly GE Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():4209-4220. PubMed ID: 33293790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry for intraocular lens power calculation: a retrospective cross-sectional study. An Y; Kang EK; Kim H; Kang MJ; Byun YS; Joo CK BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 30678658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer. Ventura BV; Ventura MC; Wang L; Koch DD; Weikert MP J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28317681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement Between Two Optical Biometers Based on Large Coherence Length SS-OCT and Scheimpflug Imaging/Partial Coherence Interferometry. Tu R; Yu J; Savini G; Ye J; Ning R; Xiong J; Chen S; Huang J J Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 36(7):459-465. PubMed ID: 32644168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability of new optical biometer and agreement with 2 validated optical biometers, all based on SS-OCT. Galzignato A; Lupardi E; Hoffer KJ; Barboni P; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Jan; 49(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 36026703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of a new swept-source optical biometer with a partial coherence interferometry. Lee HK; Kim MK BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):269. PubMed ID: 30340561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]