These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3508193)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of the Nippon Colin BP-103N blood pressure monitor.
    Slabý A; Arenberger P; Josífko M; Hrabák P
    J Hum Hypertens; 1987 Jun; 1(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 3508193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of an automatic sphygmomanometer].
    Slabý A; Arenberger P; Josífko M; Hrabák P
    Sb Lek; 1989 Sep; 91(8):274-84. PubMed ID: 2617128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Contribution of automatic sphygmomanometers for one-time measurement of blood pressure].
    Slabý A; Josífko M
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1990 Aug; 129(35):1107-10. PubMed ID: 2224970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of automatic sphygmomanometers].
    Slabý A; Arenberger P; Josífko M; Hrabák P
    Sb Lek; 1989 Sep; 91(8-9):274-84. PubMed ID: 2562584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does sequential automated measurement improve the estimate of resting blood pressure?
    Slabý A; Josífko M
    J Hum Hypertens; 1992 Feb; 6(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 1583628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much?
    Mackie A; Whincup P; McKinnon M
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 May; 9(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 7623370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
    Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the DINAMAP blood pressure monitor in an ambulatory primary care setting.
    Ornstein S; Markert G; Litchfield L; Zemp L
    J Fam Pract; 1988 May; 26(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 3367116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical validation of an automatic device measuring blood pressure in the fingers.
    Arosio E; Zannoni M
    Panminerva Med; 1999 Jun; 41(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 10479914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical evaluation of the Accutracker--a lightweight ambulatory blood pressure monitor.
    Phillips DI; Braithwaite J; Newcombe RG; Lazarus JH
    J Hum Hypertens; 1989 Dec; 3(6):463-5. PubMed ID: 2607520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
    Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of an oscillometric automatic blood pressure device: the Omron HEM403C.
    Walma EP; van Dooren C; van der Does E; Prins A; Mulder P; Hoes AW
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Mar; 9(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 7783097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
    Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.
    Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of the Dinamap 1846 XT automated blood pressure monitor.
    Beaubien ER; Card CM; Card SE; Biem HJ; Wilson TW
    J Hum Hypertens; 2002 Sep; 16(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 12214262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.