299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35081953)
1. The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health.
Hajesmaeel-Gohari S; Khordastan F; Fatehi F; Samzadeh H; Bahaadinbeigy K
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Jan; 22(1):22. PubMed ID: 35081953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The most used questionnaires for evaluating telemedicine services.
Hajesmaeel-Gohari S; Bahaadinbeigy K
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Feb; 21(1):36. PubMed ID: 33531013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review.
Muro-Culebras A; Escriche-Escuder A; Martin-Martin J; Roldán-Jiménez C; De-Torres I; Ruiz-Muñoz M; Gonzalez-Sanchez M; Mayoral-Cleries F; Biró A; Tang W; Nikolova B; Salvatore A; Cuesta-Vargas AI
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Dec; 9(12):e15433. PubMed ID: 34855618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. German Version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire in a Cohort of Patients With Cancer: Translation and Validation Study.
Moorthy P; Weinert L; Harms BC; Anders C; Siegel F
JMIR Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 10():e51090. PubMed ID: 37910144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Malay Version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (M-MAUQ): Translation, Adaptation, and Validation Study.
Mustafa N; Safii NS; Jaffar A; Sani NS; Mohamad MI; Abd Rahman AH; Mohd Sidik S
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Feb; 9(2):e24457. PubMed ID: 33538704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study.
Zhou L; Bao J; Setiawan IMA; Saptono A; Parmanto B
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e11500. PubMed ID: 30973342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Questionnaire for Assessing User Satisfaction With Mobile Health Apps: Development Using Rasch Measurement Theory.
Melin J; Bonn SE; Pendrill L; Trolle Lagerros Y
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 May; 8(5):e15909. PubMed ID: 32452817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying usability: an evaluation of a diabetes mHealth system on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction metrics with associated user characteristics.
Georgsson M; Staggers N
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Jan; 23(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 26377990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a metric to evaluate the ergonomic principles of assistive systems, based on the DIN 92419.
Xavier Macedo de Azevedo F; Heimgärtner R; Nebe K
Ergonomics; 2023 Jun; 66(6):821-848. PubMed ID: 36137226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mobile-Based and Cloud-Based System for Self-management of People With Type 2 Diabetes: Development and Usability Evaluation.
Salari R; R Niakan Kalhori S; GhaziSaeedi M; Jeddi M; Nazari M; Fatehi F
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jun; 23(6):e18167. PubMed ID: 34076579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: A scoping review.
Maramba I; Chatterjee A; Newman C
Int J Med Inform; 2019 Jun; 126():95-104. PubMed ID: 31029270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geospatial assistive technologies for wheelchair users: a scoping review of usability measures and criteria for mobile user interfaces and their potential applicability.
Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA; Routhier F
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):119-131. PubMed ID: 30663444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Intervention and Evaluation of Mobile Health Technologies in Management of Patients Undergoing Chronic Dialysis: Scoping Review.
Yang Y; Chen H; Qazi H; Morita PP
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Apr; 8(4):e15549. PubMed ID: 32242823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A usability study of a mobile health application for rural Ghanaian midwives.
Vélez O; Okyere PB; Kanter AS; Bakken S
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 24400748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of user satisfaction and usability of a mobile app for smoking cessation.
Luna-Perejon F; Malwade S; Styliadis C; Civit J; Cascado-Caballero D; Konstantinidis E; Abdul SS; Bamidis PD; Civit A; Li YJ
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Dec; 182():105042. PubMed ID: 31473444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usability Evaluation of Dashboards: A Systematic Literature Review of Tools.
Almasi S; Bahaadinbeigy K; Ahmadi H; Sohrabei S; Rabiei R
Biomed Res Int; 2023; 2023():9990933. PubMed ID: 36874923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usability Challenges for Health and Wellness Mobile Apps: Mixed-Methods Study Among mHealth Experts and Consumers.
Liew MS; Zhang J; See J; Ong YL
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jan; 7(1):e12160. PubMed ID: 30698528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological Quality of Manuscripts Reporting on the Usability of Mobile Applications for Pain Assessment and Management: A Systematic Review.
Almeida AF; Rocha NP; Silva AG
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jan; 17(3):. PubMed ID: 32012674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usability Evaluations of Mobile Mental Health Technologies: Systematic Review.
Inal Y; Wake JD; Guribye F; Nordgreen T
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jan; 22(1):e15337. PubMed ID: 31904579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multi-level usability evaluation of mobile health applications: A case study.
Cho H; Yen PY; Dowding D; Merrill JA; Schnall R
J Biomed Inform; 2018 Oct; 86():79-89. PubMed ID: 30145317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
