These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35082188)

  • 1. Clinical course of different long-acting insulin therapies-glargine U100, U300, degludec, and insulin degludec/insulin aspart-among Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter retrospective observational study (JDDM65 study).
    Iwamoto M; Nakanishi S; Iwamoto H; Kaneto H; Maegawa H;
    Endocr J; 2022 Jul; 69(7):763-771. PubMed ID: 35082188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine U100 on Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SWITCH 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Wysham C; Bhargava A; Chaykin L; de la Rosa R; Handelsman Y; Troelsen LN; Kvist K; Norwood P
    JAMA; 2017 Jul; 318(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 28672317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ideglira is Associated With Improved Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Cost Savings Compared with Insulin Glargine U100 Plus Insulin Aspart in the U.S.
    Dempsey M; Mocarski M; Langer J; Hunt B
    Endocr Pract; 2018 Sep; 24(9):796-804. PubMed ID: 30308134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine U100 on Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: The SWITCH 1 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Lane W; Bailey TS; Gerety G; Gumprecht J; Philis-Tsimikas A; Hansen CT; Nielsen TSS; Warren M; ;
    JAMA; 2017 Jul; 318(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 28672316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) and long-acting second-generation basal insulin (insulin degludec and insulin glargine 300 units/mL) in insulin-naïve Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes: a pilot, randomized, controlled study.
    Shimoda S; Sakamoto W; Hokamura A; Matsuo Y; Sekigami T; Ichimori S; Iwashita S; Ishii N; Otsu K; Yoshimura R; Nishiyama T; Sakaguchi M; Nishida K; Araki E
    Endocr J; 2019 Aug; 66(8):745-752. PubMed ID: 31308304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term cost-effectiveness analysis shows that IDegLira is associated with improved outcomes and lower costs compared with insulin glargine U100 plus insulin aspart in the US.
    Dempsey M; Mocarski M; Langer J; Hunt B
    J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1110-1118. PubMed ID: 30114954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/aspart (twice-daily injections), insulin glargine 300 U/mL, and insulin glulisine (basal-bolus therapy).
    Kawaguchi Y; Sawa J; Hamai C; Nishimura Y; Kumeda Y
    J Diabetes Investig; 2019 Nov; 10(6):1527-1536. PubMed ID: 30868726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100 on time in range: SWITCH PRO, a crossover study of basal insulin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes and risk factors for hypoglycaemia.
    Goldenberg RM; Aroda VR; Billings LK; Christiansen ASL; Meller Donatsky A; Parvaresh Rizi E; Podgorski G; Raslova K; Klonoff DC; Bergenstal RM
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2021 Nov; 23(11):2572-2581. PubMed ID: 34322967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative effectiveness study of degludec and insulin glargine 300 U/mL in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Tibaldi J; Hadley-Brown M; Liebl A; Haldrup S; Sandberg V; Wolden ML; Rodbard HW
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2019 Apr; 21(4):1001-1009. PubMed ID: 30552800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Insulin glargine versus insulin degludec in patients failing on oral therapy in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective real world comparative data from India.
    Ghosal S; Sinha B; Gangopadhyay KK
    Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2016; 10(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 26822462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk of hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U300 in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, head-to-head CONCLUDE trial.
    Philis-Tsimikas A; Klonoff DC; Khunti K; Bajaj HS; Leiter LA; Hansen MV; Troelsen LN; Ladelund S; Heller S; Pieber TR;
    Diabetologia; 2020 Apr; 63(4):698-710. PubMed ID: 31984443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec U100 versus insulin glargine U300 in adults with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and indirect treatment comparison.
    Martin ; Zhou Y; Takagi T; Tian YS
    Int J Clin Pharm; 2022 Jun; 44(3):587-598. PubMed ID: 35476308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment satisfaction, safety, and effectiveness of biosimilar insulin glargine is comparable in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after switching from insulin glargine or insulin degludec: a post-marketing safety study.
    Taki K; Koyanagi M; Nagaoka S; Shingaki T
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2020 Dec; 36(12):1975-1983. PubMed ID: 33030354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal or pre-/self-mixed insulin: a 26-week, randomised, treat-to-target trial.
    Kaneko S; Chow F; Choi DS; Taneda S; Hirao K; Park Y; Andersen TH; Gall MA; Christiansen JS;
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2015 Jan; 107(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 25498130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Similar glycaemic control with less nocturnal hypoglycaemia in a 38-week trial comparing the IDegAsp co-formulation with insulin glargine U100 and insulin aspart in basal insulin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Philis-Tsimikas A; Astamirova K; Gupta Y; Haggag A; Roula D; Bak BA; Fita EG; Nielsen AM; Demir T
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2019 Jan; 147():157-165. PubMed ID: 30448451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Twice-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart provides superior fasting plasma glucose control and a reduced rate of hypoglycaemia compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30 in insulin-naïve adults with Type 2 diabetes.
    Franek E; Haluzík M; Canecki Varžić S; Sargin M; Macura S; Zacho J; Christiansen JS
    Diabet Med; 2016 Apr; 33(4):497-505. PubMed ID: 26435365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100 in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Bulgaria.
    Russel-Szymczyk M; Valov V; Savova A; Manova M
    BMC Endocr Disord; 2019 Dec; 19(1):132. PubMed ID: 31796048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower rates of hypoglycemia during maintenance treatment with insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30: a combined analysis of two Phase 3a studies in type 2 diabetes.
    Christiansen JS; Niskanen L; Rasmussen S; Johansen T; Fulcher G
    J Diabetes; 2016 Sep; 8(5):720-8. PubMed ID: 26612062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 1-year, prospective, observational study of Japanese outpatients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes switching from insulin glargine or detemir to insulin degludec in basal-bolus insulin therapy (Kumamoto Insulin Degludec Observational study).
    Shimoda S; Sato M; Sekigami T; Motoshima H; Yoshimura R; Fukuda K; Matsuo Y; Noda H; Okubo M; Ichimori S; Fujisawa K; Fukunaga M; Araki E;
    J Diabetes Investig; 2016 Sep; 7(5):703-10. PubMed ID: 27181264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lower rates of hypoglycaemia in older individuals with type 2 diabetes using insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100: Results from SWITCH 2.
    Heller SR; DeVries JH; Wysham C; Hansen CT; Hansen MV; Frier BM
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2019 Jul; 21(7):1634-1641. PubMed ID: 30891886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.